Skip to main content

Security report for footshop.ua

Footshop a.s. · E-commerce · Ukraine

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Footshop a.s. operates a prominent e-commerce platform specializing in sneakers, apparel, and accessories, targeting primarily the Ukrainian market with a broad selection of popular brands such as adidas, Converse, and Vans. The company positions itself as the largest sneaker retailer in Ukraine, supported by a multi-country presence and a loyalty program called Footshop Club. The website is professionally designed with clear navigation, multi-language support, and a comprehensive product catalog, reflecting a mature digital retail business. Technically, the site leverages modern web technologies including PrestaShop CMS, React components, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot for privacy compliance. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, cookie consent mechanisms, and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Privacy policies and terms of service are clearly presented, supporting GDPR compliance. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid balance of business credibility, technical sophistication, and privacy awareness, making it a trustworthy platform for consumers.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching footshop.ua

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention footshop.ua, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
209
Employees
0
Customers
209
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
12%

3 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for footshop.ua.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Footshop's market positioning as a leading sneaker and apparel retailer in Ukraine is reinforced by its extensive product range and multi-regional online presence. The business model focuses on direct online sales complemented by physical stores in various European cities. The company benefits from strong brand partnerships and a loyalty program that encourages repeat purchases. Its competitive advantage lies in offering premium and limited-edition products alongside mainstream brands. The website's multilingual support and regional domains indicate a strategic approach to market segmentation and localization. The absence of suspicious domains and consistent WHOIS data further support the legitimacy and operational transparency of the business.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with enforced HTTPS, cookie consent banners, and use of reputable third-party services for analytics and marketing. No critical security headers were explicitly found in the HTML but are likely implemented server-side. There is no evidence of exposed credentials, malware, or phishing indicators. However, the absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in vulnerability management. The site would benefit from publishing a security.txt file and explicit security headers to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the security measures align well with industry best practices for e-commerce platforms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly verify security headers such as X-Frame-Options and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish a formal security policy and provide incident response contact channels (e.g., security@ or abuse@ emails).
  3. Add a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet compliance standards and improve user experience.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and dependencies to mitigate supply chain risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Footshop a.s.
Description
Найбільший вибір кросівок adidas, Converse, Vans та багато інших брендів. Все в наявності! Купуйте за вигідні ціни на Footshop.ua.
Key services
Online retail of sneakers, Clothing and accessories sales, Footshop Club loyalty program
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Typekit Fonts, Webpack, React (implied by hypernova keys and JSON data), PrestaShop (implied by URL structure and scripts)
Frameworks
PrestaShop, React (partial usage)
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of service workers with unregister logic

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Strong presence of privacy and cookie policies with consent mechanisms.
  3. Comprehensive navigation structure with multiple language and country versions.
  4. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  5. No visible security vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data.
  6. Contact information is clearly provided and consistent.
  7. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with brand.
  8. No evidence of suspicious or malicious activity.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the PrestaShop CMS platform, enhanced with React components and modern JavaScript bundling via Webpack. It uses Google Tag Manager and Cookiebot for analytics and privacy management. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and preconnect hints for performance. Fonts are loaded asynchronously from Typekit. The presence of service worker scripts indicates progressive web app features. Performance is moderate, with room for optimization in loading times and accessibility. SEO is well addressed with meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data. The technical stack is modern and suitable for a medium-sized e-commerce operation, though continuous monitoring and updates are recommended to maintain security and performance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with footshop.ua. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review footshop.ua.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.