Skip to main content

Security report for foodunion.com

Food Union · Other · N/a

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

76/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Food Union operates a professional website focused on food-related products or services, targeting consumers and businesses interested in the food industry. The company appears to be a small-sized entity founded in 2014, with consistent branding and a clear digital presence. The website uses WordPress CMS with Elementor, supported by Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services, and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for analytics and marketing purposes. Cookiebot is implemented for GDPR-compliant cookie consent management, reflecting a good privacy posture. Technically, the website is well-structured with modern technologies and good SEO practices, including structured data and Open Graph metadata. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well. Security-wise, HTTPS is enforced with a good SSL configuration, and cookie consent is granular. However, there is room for improvement in publishing explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and enabling DNSSEC for enhanced DNS security. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid security posture with no critical vulnerabilities detected. Privacy compliance is good, with clear cookie consent and a comprehensive privacy policy. Business credibility is supported by consistent branding and transparent domain registration. Strategic recommendations include adding terms of service, security policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms to further enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching foodunion.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
76

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Food Union positions itself as a niche player in the food sector, likely serving both consumers and businesses. The business model appears to be product and service-oriented within the food industry. The company leverages partnerships with Google for analytics and marketing, and Cloudflare for hosting infrastructure. Growth indicators include a well-maintained website with modern tools and compliance with GDPR via Cookiebot. The absence of explicit contact information and terms of service suggests a focus on digital presence over direct customer engagement. The company could benefit from expanding transparency and customer support channels to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and a good SSL setup. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, providing users control over preferences, statistics, and marketing cookies. The use of Google reCAPTCHA helps mitigate bot traffic on forms. However, the lack of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure pages indicates gaps in formal security governance. DNSSEC is not enabled, which is a recommended enhancement for DNS security. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected. Overall, the site is secure but would benefit from formalizing security documentation and incident response readiness.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information.
  3. Add a terms of service page to clarify user agreements and legal protections.
  4. Implement and publish a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and cookies to minimize privacy risks.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Food Union
Description
Food Union is a business focused on food-related products or services, targeting consumers interested in food industry offerings.
Key services
Food products, Food industry services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.7.2, Elementor 3.28.4, jQuery 3.3.1, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Cookiebot
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • Use of reCAPTCHA for forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google
Tracking pixels
Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses HTTPS with valid SSL
  2. Cookie consent implemented with detailed categories
  3. No visible contact emails or phone numbers on homepage
  4. No terms of service page found
  5. Uses modern WordPress CMS with Elementor builder
  6. Google Analytics and Tag Manager used but MonsterInsights plugin not fully configured
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  8. No explicit security or incident response policies published
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 6.7.2 with Elementor 3.28.4, leveraging jQuery and modern CSS. It uses Cloudflare for DNS and CDN, enhancing performance and security. Google Tag Manager and Analytics are integrated but MonsterInsights plugin is not fully configured, indicating potential for improved analytics management. Cookiebot provides comprehensive cookie consent management. The site includes structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and social media integration. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. There is no evidence of outdated or vulnerable libraries. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-maintained with opportunities for further optimization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with foodunion.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review foodunion.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.