Skip to main content

Security report for fondzabranyskod.cz

Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 1 other check.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fondzabranyskod.cz appears to be protected by a security mechanism that blocks normal access, presenting a CAPTCHA challenge and obfuscated JavaScript. This limits the ability to analyze the actual content and business information. The domain is registered since 2014 under the REG-WEBGLOBE registrar with a nameserver at ignum.com, indicating a Czech Republic origin. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies are found, nor any contact information or social media links. The technical infrastructure is minimal, with no visible CMS or modern frameworks, and the site shows poor performance and accessibility characteristics. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS and security headers, and the presence of obfuscated scripts suggests anti-bot measures but also raises concerns about transparency. Overall, the site is low in trustworthiness and professionalism, with critical issues related to accessibility and compliance.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of fondzabranyskod.cz. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fondzabranyskod.cz

This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
77
Security headers
80
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the blocked content and minimal visible information, detailed business intelligence is limited. The domain age suggests a stable presence since 2014, likely a small or niche project in the Czech Republic. No clear business model, market positioning, or services can be identified from the available data. The absence of contact details and policies reduces credibility and suggests limited customer engagement or transparency. No partnerships or related domains are evident. The site may serve a specific internal or restricted audience given the security challenge.

Security posture

The website employs a security challenge page with CAPTCHA and obfuscated JavaScript, indicating some level of bot mitigation. However, the lack of HTTPS, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or security policies represent significant security and compliance gaps. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided. The security score is low, and the site is vulnerable to trust and compliance issues. The obfuscation may hinder security audits and user trust. Overall, the security posture is weak and requires substantial improvements to meet modern standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish clear and comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Provide visible and verified contact information including email and phone for customer support and incident response.
  4. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  5. Reduce or clarify obfuscated JavaScript to improve transparency and facilitate security reviews.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Generic detected. Page content is a security challenge with CAPTCHA and obfuscated JavaScript, indicating a WAF or anti-bot mechanism blocking normal access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
10/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by a security challenge page with CAPTCHA.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact information or business details visible on the page.
  4. Obfuscated JavaScript and minimal content suggest anti-bot measures.
  5. No external links except a single nameserver domain in WHOIS data.
  6. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  7. No social media or email contacts found.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain registered in 2014 with REG-WEBGLOBE registrar.
  9. Website appears to be a small or niche project with minimal public presence.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses basic JavaScript and minimal HTML with obfuscated scripts likely for anti-bot purposes. No modern frameworks or CMS are detected. The hosting provider is REG-WEBGLOBE, a Czech registrar and hosting service. Performance is slow due to security challenge overhead and lack of optimization. Mobile and accessibility features are poor, with no responsive design or ARIA attributes. SEO optimization is minimal with no meta tags or structured data. The site lacks analytics or marketing tools, indicating low digital maturity. Technical debt is high, and modernization is recommended to improve user experience and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 75/100Medium23 findingsView report
  2. 75/100Medium23 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fondzabranyskod.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fondzabranyskod.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.