Skip to main content

Security report for fmmaf.fr

Fédération de MMA Français · Other · France

Partial score · DNS & email only

71/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fédération de MMA Français (FMMAF) is the national governing body for Mixed Martial Arts in France, providing licensing, club affiliation, training, and event organization services. The website positions FMMAF as a professional federation affiliated with the International Mixed Martial Arts Federation (IMMAF), targeting MMA practitioners, clubs, and enthusiasts across France. The business model focuses on regulatory oversight, athlete development, and promotion of MMA as a sport within the country. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using the Divi theme and several specialized plugins such as EventON for event management and Matomo for analytics. The site is well-structured with good SEO practices including JSON-LD structured data and Open Graph metadata. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and includes standard security headers, indicating a good baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit privacy policy and terms of service documents, as well as no visible incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, suggests room for improvement in compliance and transparency. Overall, the website is trustworthy and professional, though the lack of WHOIS registrant data and some compliance documents slightly reduce the trust score. Strategic recommendations include publishing comprehensive privacy and security policies, implementing a vulnerability disclosure program, and enhancing accessibility and compliance features.

Scanned

3 of 7 checks could not complete. The site may be unreachable or blocking automated scans, so the results below cover only what could be checked. Try a rescan later.

NIS2 and GDPR posture

NIS2 outside view
Not assessed
GDPR outside view
Not assessed

Both readouts depend on the site's pages, which could not be loaded in this scan.

Priority findings

1 finding rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fmmaf.fr

This scan found 18 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
Average
71

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • GDPR outside view: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FMMAF holds a strong market position as the official MMA federation in France, leveraging its affiliation with IMMAF to maintain legitimacy. Its competitive advantage lies in its comprehensive service offering including licensing, club affiliation, event organization, and training programs. The federation targets a broad audience from amateur practitioners to professional athletes and clubs. Revenue streams likely include licensing fees, event ticket sales, and training certifications. The partnership ecosystem includes ticketing platforms, event venues, and digital service providers. Growth indicators include a detailed event calendar and active social media presence. Operationally, FMMAF demonstrates a mature digital presence but could benefit from enhanced compliance and security transparency.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS, security headers, and no visible sensitive data exposure. Use of Matomo analytics indicates a preference for privacy-conscious tracking. However, the absence of published security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms represents a compliance gap. No critical vulnerabilities or malware indicators were detected in the content. The security score is good but could be improved by formalizing security governance and transparency. The site does not appear to be behind a WAF or security challenge, ensuring accessibility. Overall, FMMAF’s security posture is adequate for its business type but should evolve to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service documents prominently on the website.
  2. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to improve compliance with standards such as WCAG.
  4. Add explicit incident response contact information and security policy details to increase transparency.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and plugins to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fédération de MMA Français
Description
Fédération de MMA Français
Key services
Licensing practitioners, Affiliating clubs, Organizing events and competitions, Providing training and grading, Regulatory and anti-doping efforts
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Divi Theme, EventON plugin, Matomo Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Freshdesk Support, Instagram Feed plugin, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Yoast SEO
Platforms
WordPress CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Security headers present
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo, Google Analytics (via GTM)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Matomo Analytics
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and event listings.
  2. No WHOIS data available, possibly due to privacy or recent registration.
  3. Strong use of structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO and event information.
  4. Multiple external domains used for analytics, fonts, and event ticketing.
  5. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented.
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on homepage.
  7. Social media presence on Twitter, Facebook, YouTube is linked.
  8. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in visible content.
  9. Site uses WordPress with Divi theme and several plugins.
  10. Security headers and HTTPS are properly configured.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern WordPress CMS platform using the Divi theme, supported by multiple plugins for event management, analytics, and customer support. It uses Google Fonts and Matomo for analytics, indicating a blend of popular and privacy-focused technologies. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design and includes structured data for SEO enhancement. Performance is moderate, with potential improvements in caching and script optimization. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the presence of wpserveur.net tracker suggests managed WordPress hosting. The technical stack is robust for the federation’s needs but could benefit from enhanced accessibility and performance tuning.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fmmaf.fr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fmmaf.fr.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.