Skip to main content

Security report for flying-rat.online

Flying Rat Studio · Technology · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flying Rat Studio is a small, Prague-based game development studio specializing in co-development, porting, and optimization of games for multiple platforms including VR and consoles. They collaborate with well-known studios and work on internal projects focused on gameplay and fun. The website is professionally designed, providing detailed project descriptions and links to major game stores, reflecting a credible and niche market position. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as JavaScript and Babylon.js, with evidence of Bootstrap framework usage. The site is mobile optimized and SEO friendly but lacks some accessibility features. Security posture is moderate with no visible vulnerabilities but missing security headers and privacy policies. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, which is common for small studios but reduces transparency. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional but could improve compliance and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flying-rat.online

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the technology sector focusing on game development services including co-development, porting, and performance optimization. Their partnerships with established studios and presence on major digital distribution platforms indicate a solid market position within the gaming industry. The business model relies on service contracts and internal project development. The target audience includes game studios and gamers interested in VR and console games. The company maintains active social media channels and a Discord community, supporting engagement and marketing efforts. Growth potential is indicated by ongoing collaborations and internal projects. Lack of public WHOIS data is typical for privacy but limits external trust signals.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is assumed but not explicitly confirmed. No security headers were detected in the provided data, which is a gap. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were found. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, particularly regarding GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present. Contact information is limited to general emails without dedicated security contacts. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small studio but would benefit from enhanced headers, documented policies, and formal vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  3. Add a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure page to facilitate responsible reporting of security issues.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users.
  5. Consider publishing WHOIS registrant information or providing verified business credentials to increase transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flying Rat Studio
Description
Flying Rat Studio is a game development studio based in Prague, Czech Republic. They are a passionate team of experienced developers focused on game development, co-development, porting, and optimization of games for various platforms.
Key services
Game co-development, Game porting, Performance optimization, Multiplayer and networking implementation, Internal game development
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Babylon.js, Unreal Engine 4, Unity, WebGL
Frameworks
Bootstrap (navbar classes suggest usage), Babylon.js
Platforms
Web, PC, PlayStation VR, Xbox, Nintendo Switch
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • No visible vulnerable libraries

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF detected.
  2. WHOIS data is unavailable or protected, limiting domain registration insights.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the website.
  4. Contact information is limited to email only; no phone or physical address provided.
  5. Website content is professionally presented and focused on game development services.
  6. Multiple external links to reputable game stores and social media platforms.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data; SSL status unknown.
  8. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the HTML content.
  9. No forms visible for data collection except hidden email input fields.
  10. No evidence of adult or questionable content.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern JavaScript-based tech stack including Babylon.js for WebGL content and Unreal Engine and Unity for game projects. The presence of Bootstrap classes suggests a responsive design framework. The site loads a single main JavaScript bundle and CSS stylesheet, indicating a streamlined front-end. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization. No CMS or hosting provider information is evident. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The site lacks advanced accessibility features but maintains good SEO practices with proper meta tags and canonical links. Technical debt appears low but security and compliance improvements are recommended.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flying-rat.online. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flying-rat.online.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.