Skip to main content

Security report for fluke.com

Fluke Corporation · Manufacturing · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fluke Corporation is a globally recognized leader in manufacturing and distributing professional electronic test tools, calibration instruments, and networking solutions. The company serves a broad industrial and technical audience, offering rugged, reliable, and accurate measurement products and software. Their market position is strong, supported by a mature domain and multiple subsidiary brands. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 10 with modern JavaScript libraries and integrates extensive third-party analytics and marketing tools, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. However, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS implementation is a critical security flaw that undermines user trust and data protection. Additionally, the lack of visible privacy and cookie policies raises compliance concerns. Overall, while the business credibility and content quality are high, the security posture requires urgent improvement to align with best practices and regulatory requirements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fluke.com

This scan found 14 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
85
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
0
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention fluke.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
4,605
Employees
27
Customers
4,181
Third parties
397
Weak passwords
11%

Latest record dated 2026-05-20 · 63 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for fluke.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –connect.fluke.com2026-05-20
  • –flkext.fluke.com2026-05-11
  • –connect.fluke.com2026-04-30
  • –fluke.com2026-01-13
  • –nect.fluke.com2026-01-13

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fluke Corporation operates in the manufacturing and technology sectors, targeting industrial, engineering, and medical professionals worldwide. Their business model focuses on product manufacturing, distribution, and software solutions for test and measurement. The company has a broad partnership ecosystem with multiple subsidiaries and related brands, enhancing market reach and product diversity. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image, supporting a large enterprise scale. Growth indicators include extensive regional presence and multilingual support. However, the lack of explicit privacy and security policies on the website may impact customer confidence and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website demonstrates partial adherence to security best practices through the use of multiple security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options. Despite this, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and disabled TLS protocols represent critical vulnerabilities, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining secure communications. The extensive use of third-party scripts and tracking services without visible privacy compliance further increases risk. Incident response and security policy information are not publicly available, indicating potential gaps in transparency and readiness. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS issues and enhancement of privacy compliance are essential to improve the security posture.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Enable modern TLS protocols (TLS 1.2 or higher) and configure strong cipher suites.
  3. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms.
  4. Review and tighten Content Security Policy to minimize use of 'unsafe-inline' and 'unsafe-eval'.
  5. Publish security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency.
  6. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking services to ensure compliance and security.
  7. Enable OCSP stapling and session resumption to improve SSL performance and security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is powered by Drupal 10 CMS, leveraging jQuery and Bootstrap frameworks for frontend functionality and styling. It integrates multiple third-party services including Google Tag Manager, Optimizely, and various analytics and advertising platforms. Hosting is via Cloudflare, providing caching and CDN services. Despite modern technology usage, the site lacks a valid SSL certificate and proper HTTPS configuration, which is a significant technical debt. Performance metrics are unavailable, but the presence of many external scripts may impact load times. Mobile optimization appears good with responsive design elements. Accessibility features are basic but present. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and canonical links. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern but requires critical security upgrades and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fluke.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fluke.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.