Skip to main content

Security report for fluidpayments.io

Domains By Proxy, LLC · Technology · United States

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fluidpayments.io is a recently established technology company specializing in AI-powered cashier solutions tailored for the iGaming industry. Their platform aims to enhance deposit processes by boosting conversion rates and reducing fraud, thereby improving player experience and revenue for iGaming operators. The website presents a professional and modern design built on the Framer platform and hosted with Cloudflare DNS services, indicating a contemporary digital infrastructure. However, the domain is relatively new, having been registered in October 2023, and uses privacy protection services, which is typical for startups but limits public registrant transparency. Security-wise, the site benefits from HTTPS and domain locking mechanisms but lacks DNSSEC and important security headers, which could be improved to enhance protection. The absence of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, as well as contact information, represents compliance and trust gaps that should be addressed. Overall, the website is functional and visually appealing but requires enhancements in privacy compliance and security documentation to strengthen its credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, LinkedIn, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fluidpayments.io

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
65
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets the niche market of iGaming operators seeking advanced payment solutions that leverage AI to optimize cashier functionality. Their business model appears to be B2B SaaS, focusing on seamless deposit experiences and fraud mitigation. The market positioning emphasizes technology innovation and operational efficiency. The lack of visible contact details and corporate information on the website suggests an early-stage or stealth approach to market entry. The use of privacy-protected WHOIS data aligns with common startup practices. No partnerships or subsidiaries are publicly disclosed. The company’s growth potential depends on establishing trust through transparent policies and expanding its digital footprint with comprehensive compliance and security measures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security posture with HTTPS enabled and domain status protections in place. However, the lack of DNSSEC and missing security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and Strict-Transport-Security reduce its defense-in-depth capabilities. No incident response or security policy information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. To improve security maturity, the company should implement recommended headers, enable DNSSEC, and publish clear security and incident response documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and build user trust.
  3. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to harden the website against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and incident response.
  5. Develop and disclose a formal security policy and incident response plan to demonstrate security governance and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Domains By Proxy, LLC
Description
Boost conversions and reduce fraud with Fluid’s AI-powered cashier. Deliver seamless payments and better player experiences for higher revenue.
Key services
AI-powered cashier, Seamless deposits, Fraud reduction, Payment processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Cloudflare DNS
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and other EPP protections

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a modern, professionally designed landing page for an AI-powered iGaming payment solution
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service pages found
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found on the landing page
  4. No security policy or incident response information published
  5. No analytics or tracking scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet
  6. Domain uses Cloudflare DNS but DNSSEC is not enabled
  7. WHOIS data is privacy protected but domain status flags indicate good domain management practices
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using the Framer platform, leveraging modern web fonts and responsive design techniques. Hosting and DNS are managed via Cloudflare, providing reliable infrastructure and HTTPS support. The site loads moderate content with good mobile optimization but lacks advanced accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data, enhancing social media sharing and search engine visibility. No analytics or tracking scripts were detected, indicating minimal user tracking. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from additional security configurations and performance optimizations to improve resilience and user experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fluidpayments.io. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fluidpayments.io.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.