Skip to main content

Security report for flowtech.dk

FLOWTECH A/S · Manufacturing · Denmark

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FLOWTECH A/S is a Danish manufacturing company specializing in the design, production, installation, and commissioning of stainless steel process equipment for the food, chemical, and pharmaceutical industries. The company positions itself as a specialist provider of custom total solutions, serving primarily B2B clients. Their website is professionally designed, multilingual, and optimized for performance and SEO, indicating a mature digital presence. The technical infrastructure is based on WordPress with modern plugins such as WP Rocket and WPML, ensuring good performance and multilingual support. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no exposed sensitive data, but lacks advanced security headers and published security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent mechanism present but no explicit privacy or terms of service pages found. WHOIS data is unavailable, which slightly reduces trustworthiness but the website content and professional presentation support legitimacy. Overall, the site is well-built and credible, with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flowtech.dk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
25
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FLOWTECH A/S operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on stainless steel process equipment for specialized industries. Their multilingual website suggests an international or at least regional market reach beyond Denmark. The business model is centered on providing custom-engineered solutions, which likely involves project-based revenue streams and close client collaboration. The presence of CE marking and detailed case studies indicates compliance with industry standards and a focus on quality. The company targets industrial clients in food, pharma, and chemical sectors, leveraging technical expertise as a competitive advantage. The website's content and structure reflect a medium-sized enterprise with consistent branding and professional communication. No parent or subsidiary companies are identified, suggesting an independent operation. The company could benefit from enhanced transparency around certifications and compliance to strengthen market position.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable plugins to enhance performance and security. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others is a gap that could expose the site to certain web-based attacks. No security policy or incident response information is published, which limits transparency and preparedness perception. There is no evidence of a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file, which are best practices for mature security postures. The cookie consent mechanism is implemented, supporting GDPR compliance, but no privacy policy page was found in the analyzed content. Overall, the security posture is moderate with good foundational practices but lacking in advanced security governance and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages to improve compliance and user trust.
  2. Implement and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Create and publish a security policy and incident response contact information to enhance transparency and readiness.
  4. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
  5. Regularly audit and update all plugins and dependencies to mitigate risks from vulnerable libraries.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FLOWTECH A/S
Description
FlowTech A/S projektere, producerer, monterer og idriftsætte procesanlæg i rustfrit stål til levnedsmiddel-, kemisk, farmaceutisk.
Key services
Design and production of process equipment, Installation and commissioning, Custom total solutions in stainless steel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, jQuery, Swiper, Fancybox, SitePress Multilingual CMS (WPML)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Use of security and performance plugin WP Rocket
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content
  2. No WHOIS data available from DK registry
  3. Professional multilingual WordPress site with SEO and performance optimizations
  4. Contact phone number clearly displayed with Danish country code
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found in provided content
  6. Cookie consent mechanism present and active
  7. No visible security policy or incident response information
  8. No explicit certifications or compliance badges displayed
  9. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found
  10. Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with a modern tech stack including jQuery, Swiper for sliders, Fancybox for media display, and WP Rocket for caching and performance optimization. Multilingual support is provided by WPML. The site uses Google Tag Manager for analytics and tracking. The HTML and CSS are valid and well-structured, with responsive design ensuring good mobile usability. Performance optimizations such as lazy loading and preconnect hints are implemented. No hosting provider information was detected from the content. The site demonstrates good technical maturity but could improve accessibility features and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flowtech.dk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flowtech.dk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.