Skip to main content

Security report for floreon.cz

MIRAMO spol. s r.o. · Technology · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Floreon+ Web is a specialized environmental and geospatial data visualization platform operated by MIRAMO spol. s r.o., a Czech Republic based company. The platform offers interactive mapping services with layers including floods, air pollution, traffic, and landslides, targeting environmental researchers, government agencies, and the general public interested in environmental data. The website leverages modern web technologies such as React and OpenLayers to deliver a dynamic and interactive user experience. However, the site lacks explicit privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which are critical for compliance and user trust. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS usage but missing key security headers and vulnerability disclosures. Overall, the site is professionally designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and security best practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching floreon.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Payments by EveryPay; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

This report was scored with an earlier method that also averaged the NIS2 and AI readings, so its score is not directly comparable with newer scans. A rescan applies the method described here.

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the technology sector focusing on environmental data services. Its niche market position is supported by interactive mapping and environmental monitoring tools. The business model appears to be service-oriented, providing data visualization and analysis tools likely for public sector and research clients. The absence of detailed business information and contact data on the site limits direct customer engagement but suggests a focus on digital service delivery. The use of Google Tag Manager indicates some level of marketing and analytics sophistication. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is enforced, but no security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or HSTS are detected, which are important for mitigating common web vulnerabilities. There is no visible vulnerability disclosure or incident response information, which limits transparency and readiness for security incidents. The absence of privacy and cookie policies also indicates compliance gaps with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the HTML content. The site should improve its security posture by implementing recommended headers, policies, and disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a vulnerability disclosure policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and security readiness.
  4. Include clear contact information such as company email and phone numbers to enhance business credibility and user trust.
  5. Improve SEO and accessibility features to increase website reach and usability.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
MIRAMO spol. s r.o.
Description
The website floreon.eu appears to be a web-based mapping and environmental data visualization platform, offering layers such as floods, air pollution, traffic, and landslides. It provides interactive map features, timeline controls, stored events, and user account management functionalities.
Key services
Interactive environmental mapping, Layered data visualization (floods, air pollution, traffic, landslides), User account management and event storage, Time-based data animation and filtering
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
OpenLayers, React, JavaScript, CSS, Google Tag Manager
Frameworks
React
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
55/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS (implied by URL https://)
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the page.
  2. Multiple interactive forms for login, registration, password reset, and settings are present but no contact forms or direct contact info.
  3. No emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses found in the HTML content.
  4. Use of Google Tag Manager indicates tracking but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  5. Website uses modern JavaScript frameworks (React) and mapping libraries (OpenLayers).
  6. No visible security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information.
  7. No security headers detected in the provided HTML content.
  8. Website content is professional and focused on environmental data visualization.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern tech stack including React for UI and OpenLayers for mapping functionalities, indicating a well-structured front-end architecture. Google Tag Manager is used for analytics and tracking. The site loads multiple custom JavaScript bundles and fonts hosted on the same domain, suggesting a self-managed hosting environment. Performance appears moderate with some complex UI elements like timelines and interactive layers. Mobile optimization is basic, and accessibility features are minimal but present. SEO optimization is poor due to lack of meta tags and structured data. There is no CMS detected, implying a custom-built solution. Hosting provider details are not available from the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with floreon.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

Loading reviews…

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.