a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
Security headers
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing X-Frame-Options header
Prevents clickjacking attacks
What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"
This scan found 17 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
Full report
€39.90one-time
The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
Email delivery with an unlock code
Lifetime access to this report
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
59
Not counted
Email security: did not complete in this scan.
DNS health: did not complete in this scan.
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention floatfactory.kr, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for floatfactory.kr right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
플롯팩토리 targets businesses and individuals seeking IT services and software education in Korea. Their business model includes direct service offerings and participation in government voucher programs, indicating a strategy to leverage public funding for growth. The company maintains partnerships such as with newsac.co.kr and uses modern web technologies to deliver services. The lack of extensive certifications or security policies suggests a small to medium enterprise still maturing in compliance and security practices. Their market position is that of a reliable, innovative IT service provider with a focus on education and software solutions.
Security posture
The website enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data, indicating a baseline security maturity. However, the absence of security headers like Content-Security-Policy and lack of published security or incident response policies highlight areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or malware indicators were found, but privacy compliance is weak due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of a personal email for administrative contact is common but not ideal for security and trust. Overall, the security posture is moderate with room for enhancements in policy transparency and technical controls.
Recommendations
Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR and privacy compliance.
Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
Provide clear incident response contact information and consider establishing a security policy to build trust and readiness.
Use a professional company email address for administrative and contact purposes to improve credibility.
Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve security posture.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
(주)플롯팩토리
Description
새로운 시각으로 세상을 바라보는 방법으로 소프트웨어를 교육과 함께 잇는 플롯팩토리입니다. 늘 새로운 것을 추구하며, 늘 새로운 것을 만들어내는 플롯팩토리와 함께하세요.
Key services
Software development, Design outsourcing, Security consulting, Government support consulting, Data voucher services, AI voucher services, Innovation voucher services
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent
Technology
Stack
Next.js, React, Google Analytics, AOS (Animate On Scroll), Video HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript
Frameworks
Next.js
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good
Security
Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
HTTPS enabled
No exposed sensitive data in HTML
No visible vulnerable libraries
Analytics and tracking
Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor
Advertising
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges
No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
Contact information is limited to email and physical address; no phone number found
No security or incident response policies published
Modern web technologies used with good performance and mobile optimization
Business appears to be a small Korean IT company focused on software and design services
Use of Google Analytics without visible privacy disclosures
No visible certifications or security accreditations
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with floatfactory.kr. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review floatfactory.kr.