Skip to main content

Security report for flamesgroup.com

Flames Group SIA · Telecommunications · United Arab Emirates

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

50/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Flames Group SIA is a telecommunications company specializing in VoIP traffic operations and manufacturing VoIP-GSM gateways. Established in 2005, the company operates primarily in the Central and Eastern European markets and maintains a significant network of VoIP partners and equipment owners. Their business model focuses on buying and selling voice and SMS services, connecting providers and resellers with competitive rates. The website, currently under construction, provides basic business information and contact details, including social media links and a legal address in the UAE. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and Google Tag Manager, with hosting provided by DreamHost. However, the site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies and does not implement DNSSEC or security headers, which are areas for improvement. The security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but missing some best practices. Overall, the domain registration data aligns well with the business claims, supporting legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching flamesgroup.com

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
35
Average
50

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company holds a strong position as a VoIP traffic operator and equipment manufacturer with over 14 years of experience and a sizable partner network. Their competitive advantage lies in cost-saving telecom solutions and a broad reseller ecosystem. The business targets telecom providers and resellers needing voice and SMS services. The partnership with ANTRAX for VoIP-GSM gateways indicates a diversified product offering. Growth indicators include active participation in telecom events and a focus on expanding communication channels via social media. The business model is wholesale and manufacturing, with revenue streams from voice/SMS traffic and equipment sales.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled and no visible exposed sensitive data. However, the absence of DNSSEC, security headers, and formal security or incident response policies indicates gaps in security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or data protection officer information is provided, and privacy compliance is weak due to missing policies. The use of multiple third-party tracking scripts increases privacy risks. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not evident from the site content.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to enhance DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website.
  4. Establish and disclose an incident response policy and provide dedicated security contact channels.
  5. Review and minimize third-party tracking scripts to reduce privacy risks and improve user trust.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FLAMES GROUP FZE
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Flames Group SIA
Description
Flames Group is a VoIP traffic operator and manufacturer of VoIP-GSM gateways. They connect providers, telecom companies, and resellers by buying and selling voice and SMS services. The company also organizes telecom events such as the one in Kyiv. Founded in 2005, they have over 14 years of experience, 45 qualified employees, and a large network of VoIP partners and equipment owners.
Key services
Voice services, SMS services, VoIP-GSM gateways manufacturing
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Google Fonts (Lato, Montserrat), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snapchat Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, jQuery (implied by Bootstrap usage)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
60/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Twitter Ads
Tracking pixels
LinkedIn Insight Tag, Snapchat Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is under construction but contains meaningful business information.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps.
  3. Contact information is present but no direct emails found.
  4. Use of multiple third-party tracking and advertising scripts.
  5. No security headers detected in provided data.
  6. WHOIS data consistent with business claims and domain age.
  7. No WAF or blocking detected; site fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Bootstrap and Google Fonts, supported by Google Tag Manager and analytics/tracking scripts from LinkedIn, Snapchat, Twitter, and Google Analytics. Hosting is via DreamHost, a reputable provider. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility features. The site is under construction but contains structured content and navigation. No CMS is detected, suggesting a custom or static site. Technical debt is low but security and privacy technical implementations need enhancement to meet industry best practices.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with flamesgroup.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review flamesgroup.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.