Skip to main content

Security report for fksternberk.cz

FK Šternberk · Other · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 10 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

60/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FK Šternberk is a local football club based in the Czech Republic, providing football training and match information for various age groups including youth and adult teams. The website serves as an information hub for club activities, match schedules, results, and team details. It targets football players, fans, and the local community, emphasizing youth development and community engagement. The business model is that of a non-profit sports club with a focus on football education and events. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with a modern plugin ecosystem including WPBakery Page Builder, WP Club Manager, and booking plugins. It uses Google Analytics for tracking with an opt-out mechanism. The site is mobile optimized and has good SEO practices, but performance is moderate. No hosting provider details were found. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and avoids exposing sensitive data. However, it lacks important security headers and formal privacy and cookie policies, which are compliance gaps. The absence of WHOIS data reduces domain trust assessment, but the website content and social media presence support legitimacy. Overall, the site is safe for general audiences with no adult or explicit content. Strategically, the club should improve privacy compliance, implement security headers, and maintain regular updates to plugins and themes. Adding a security.txt file and formal incident response contacts would enhance security posture and trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fksternberk.cz

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
80
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
60

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FK Šternberk operates as a community-focused football club with multiple teams across age groups, providing training, matches, and facility rentals. Its competitive advantage lies in its local presence and structured youth programs. Revenue streams likely include membership fees, sponsorships, and facility rentals. The target customers are local youth, their families, and football enthusiasts. The club maintains partnerships with local businesses and sponsors, as evidenced by partner logos and links. Growth indicators include active event updates and engagement on social media. The club's operations appear stable but small-scale, with no parent or subsidiary companies identified.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic to moderate security maturity level. HTTPS is properly configured, and no sensitive data is exposed in the HTML. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options is a notable gap. There are no visible vulnerabilities or outdated libraries detected from the HTML content. Privacy and cookie policies are missing, which is a compliance risk under GDPR. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are not present. The use of Google Analytics includes an opt-out function, showing some privacy awareness. Overall, the security posture is adequate for a small sports club website but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory requirements.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Regularly update WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  4. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability reporting and improve transparency.
  5. Enhance contact information with dedicated security or abuse email addresses to improve incident response readiness.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FOTBALOVÝ KLUB ŠTERNBERK, z.s.
Registration number
Oddíl L, vložka 1090
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FK Šternberk
Description
Fotbalový klub FK Šternberk, a football club providing information about teams, matches, results, and club activities.
Key services
Football team management, Match scheduling and results, Youth football training, Facility rental (artificial turf field)
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, PHP, JavaScript, jQuery, Google Analytics, WPBakery Page Builder, WP Club Manager plugin, Booked plugin, Booking System plugin, Visual Composer Kit, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Analytics with opt-out mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Google Analytics by MonsterInsights
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based football club site with active content and event updates.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which limits domain trust analysis.
  3. No explicit privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  4. Contact information is clearly provided with emails, phone numbers, and physical address.
  5. Use of Google Analytics with opt-out functionality is present.
  6. No security headers detected; HTTPS is enforced.
  7. No forms detected that collect personal data directly on the homepage.
  8. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is linked.
  9. Website content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using a variety of plugins for content management, event scheduling, and booking functionalities. It employs modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery and Owl Carousel for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Analytics are integrated for design and analytics respectively. The site uses WPBakery Page Builder for layout and Yoast SEO for search engine optimization. Performance is moderate, with caching and minification evident but no explicit hosting provider identified. Mobile optimization is good, and accessibility is basic but could be improved. The technical stack is typical for small to medium WordPress sites, with opportunities to enhance security and compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fksternberk.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fksternberk.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.