Skip to main content

Security report for fitzgeraldchange.com

Fitzgerald Change Consulting · Other · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fitzgerald Change Consulting, led by Benjamin Fitzgerald, offers professional career and business coaching services with a holistic approach targeting professionals and entrepreneurs. The company is positioned as a top-ranked coach with strong trust indicators such as 5-star Google reviews and a perfect Noomii score. The website is built on Squarespace, leveraging modern web technologies and is optimized for mobile devices. While the site employs HTTPS with HSTS and uses Google Tag Manager for analytics, it lacks some advanced security headers and DNSSEC, which could enhance its security posture. Privacy compliance is partial, with a cookie consent banner present but no explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages. Overall, the business appears legitimate and trustworthy with a good digital presence.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fitzgeraldchange.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the coaching sector, focusing on career and business development for professionals and entrepreneurs. It uses a service-based model with consultations and coaching sessions. The company is small, founded in 2020, and based in Latvia. Its market position is strong locally with high customer satisfaction and positive online reputation. The website integrates marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and maintains a LinkedIn presence. There are no indications of partnerships or subsidiaries from the data provided.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a good security baseline with HTTPS enforced and HSTS enabled, protecting data in transit. Domain registration statuses clientTransferProhibited and clientUpdateProhibited add protection against unauthorized domain changes. However, the absence of DNSSEC and some security headers like Content-Security-Policy reduces the overall security maturity. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information is provided, which is a gap in security transparency. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to protect against DNS spoofing and improve DNS security.
  2. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service to enhance compliance and user trust.
  3. Implement a security.txt file or vulnerability disclosure policy to facilitate responsible security reporting.
  4. Add additional security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  5. Improve accessibility features to meet standards and broaden audience reach.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Fitzgerald Change Consulting
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fitzgerald Change Consulting
Description
Career and business coaching with a holistic approach, focusing on transformative change for professionals and entrepreneurs. Services include career coaching, business coaching, and personalized consultations.
Key services
Career Coaching, Business Coaching, Consultations
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Squarespace, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts, Typekit Fonts, JavaScript
Platforms
Squarespace
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Client transfer and update prohibited domain status
  • HSTS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via Google Tag Manager)
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Marketing tools
Squarespace marketing automations
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Squarespace with modern design and good mobile optimization.
  2. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found, which is a compliance gap.
  3. Cookie banner present with opt-in consent mechanism, indicating some privacy compliance.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented with email, phone, and physical address.
  5. Social media presence limited to LinkedIn with a verified profile link.
  6. Security posture is good with HTTPS and HSTS but lacks advanced security headers and DNSSEC.
  7. No vulnerability disclosure or incident response information available.
  8. Business is small, focused on career and business coaching with positive trust signals.
  9. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on Squarespace, a reputable platform providing reliable hosting and CMS capabilities. It uses modern web fonts (Typekit, Google Fonts) and integrates Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing automation. The site loads moderately fast and is mobile optimized with responsive design. The HTML and CSS are valid and well structured. There is no evidence of technical debt or deprecated technologies. The site lacks some advanced SEO and accessibility features but overall is well implemented for a small business.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fitzgeraldchange.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fitzgeraldchange.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.