Skip to main content

Security report for fitnessvfs.lv

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

51/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fitnessvfs.lv currently serves a security CAPTCHA challenge page powered by BitNinja, designed to block automated or malicious bot traffic. No actual business content, services, or company information is presented on this page, indicating that the site is currently inaccessible to normal visitors without passing the CAPTCHA. The technical infrastructure includes legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, alongside modern tracking tools such as Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. The presence of BitNinja's security challenge suggests a proactive security posture against cyber threats, but also limits content accessibility and analysis. From a security perspective, the site employs Google reCAPTCHA v2 to mitigate automated abuse, but lacks visible HTTP security headers and privacy or cookie policies, which are critical for compliance and trust. The absence of WHOIS data due to query limits prevents verification of domain registration details, impacting trust assessment. Overall, the site is in a blocked state, limiting user experience and business visibility. Strategically, the site requires improvements in transparency, privacy compliance, and updated technical infrastructure to enhance trust and usability. The current security measures are strong in bot mitigation but insufficient in broader security best practices and compliance frameworks.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fitnessvfs.lv

This scan found 14 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
51

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the site being a security challenge page, no direct business information or market positioning is available. The domain name suggests a fitness-related business possibly operating in Latvia, but no content confirms this. The use of BitNinja security services indicates a concern for cyber threats. The business model, revenue streams, and customer segments cannot be determined from the current content. No partnerships or subsidiaries are evident. The site appears to be in a protective mode, possibly due to prior attacks or abuse.

Security posture

The security posture shows a moderate level of maturity with the implementation of BitNinja's CAPTCHA challenge and Google reCAPTCHA v2 to prevent automated attacks. However, the lack of HTTP security headers, absence of privacy and cookie policies, and no visible incident response or security contact information highlight significant gaps. The outdated CMS meta tags may indicate potential vulnerabilities if the underlying software is not updated. The site does not provide evidence of GDPR or other compliance adherence. Incident response readiness and security culture indicators are not visible.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configuration.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and other regulations.
  3. Deploy HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and HSTS.
  4. Update CMS and all software components to supported, secure versions.
  5. Publish clear contact information including security incident response contacts.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

BitNinja detected. The page is a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja blocking automated/bot access. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Description
This page is a security CAPTCHA challenge page presented by BitNinja to validate visitors and prevent automated/bot access. No business description or services are provided.
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google reCAPTCHA v2
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of Google reCAPTCHA v2 for bot mitigation
  • Security challenge page to prevent automated access

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is blocked by BitNinja security CAPTCHA challenge.
  2. No business or contact information is provided on the page.
  3. WHOIS data is unavailable due to query limit error.
  4. Page uses outdated CMS meta tags (Joomla 1.5, WordPress 2.5) indicating possible legacy software.
  5. Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are used for tracking.
  6. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  7. No security headers detected in provided data.
  8. No HTTPS enforcement information available.
  9. No contact emails or phone numbers found.
  10. Page is minimal and serves only as a bot mitigation gateway.
Technical notes

Notes

The site uses legacy CMS meta tags referencing Joomla 1.5 and WordPress 2.5, which are outdated and potentially vulnerable. Modern tracking technologies like Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager are integrated. The page is minimal and serves primarily as a security CAPTCHA challenge by BitNinja. Performance is moderate with basic mobile optimization and accessibility. No advanced frameworks or hosting provider information is discernible. The site lacks SEO optimization and structured data. Technical debt is evident due to legacy CMS references and missing security headers.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fitnessvfs.lv. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fitnessvfs.lv.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.