Skip to main content

Security report for fisiocrem.com.au

E-commerce · Australia

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.fisiocrem.com.au is an e-commerce platform focused on selling muscle pain relief gel products within the Australian market. It targets consumers seeking topical pain relief solutions and operates primarily through an online retail model. The website is built on WordPress using WooCommerce and Elementor, indicating a standard e-commerce infrastructure with common plugins and page builders. Tracking technologies such as TikTok Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity are integrated for marketing and analytics purposes. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible advanced security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data is incomplete and does not provide registrant details, which limits trust assessment from a domain registration perspective. Overall, the site appears functional and professionally designed but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
85/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fisiocrem.com.au

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
50
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
85
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in the niche healthcare e-commerce sector, specializing in muscle pain relief gels. Its market positioning is focused on Australian consumers, leveraging online sales channels. The business model is direct-to-consumer retail with a likely small to medium size operation given the limited public business information. The use of popular CMS and e-commerce frameworks suggests a standard approach to digital commerce. Absence of detailed company information, certifications, or trust signals limits competitive advantage insights. The presence of multiple tracking and marketing tools indicates an active digital marketing strategy. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the data provided.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS, which is a fundamental security requirement. However, the absence of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and others reduces the overall security posture. No evidence of vulnerability disclosure mechanisms or incident response contacts were found, which may impact the site's readiness to handle security incidents. The lack of privacy and cookie policies also indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. No exposed sensitive data or known vulnerabilities were detected in the provided content. The security score is moderate but could be improved with standard best practices and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear consent mechanisms to improve privacy compliance.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance security posture.
  3. Publish a security.txt file and provide clear contact information for security incident reporting and vulnerability disclosures.
  4. Enhance WHOIS domain registration transparency by ensuring registrant information is complete and publicly available.
  5. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and tracking pixels to minimize potential security risks and improve performance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
E-commerce website selling muscle pain relief gel products in Australia.
Key services
Online sales of muscle pain relief gel
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, WooCommerce, WordPress, Elementor, Google Tag Manager, TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled

Analytics and tracking

Services
TikTok Analytics, Google Analytics (via GTM), Microsoft Clarity
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Marketing tools
TikTok Pixel, Microsoft Clarity
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an e-commerce platform selling muscle pain relief gel in Australia.
  2. Uses WordPress with WooCommerce and Elementor for content management and e-commerce.
  3. Includes tracking pixels from TikTok, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity.
  4. No visible privacy policy, cookie policy, or terms of service pages found in the HTML content.
  5. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the provided content.
  6. WHOIS data is unavailable or restricted, limiting domain trust assessment.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. HTTPS is enabled, but security headers are not detected in the provided data.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern and popular technology stack based on WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce functionality and Elementor for page building. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including TikTok Pixel, Google Tag Manager, and Microsoft Clarity. The site appears to be moderately optimized for mobile devices and SEO, with appropriate meta tags and responsive design elements. Performance is moderate, with some deferred and async script loading. There is no evidence of advanced hosting or CDN services from the provided data. Technical debt appears low but could be improved by optimizing script loading and implementing security best practices. Overall, the infrastructure supports the business needs but has room for modernization and enhanced security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fisiocrem.com.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fisiocrem.com.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.