Skip to main content

Security report for firmaren.sk

Other · Slovakia

Medium risk. 3 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.firmaren.sk appears to be a small business or service platform based in Slovakia. The content provided is primarily technical and lacks visible business descriptions, contact information, or policy documents. The site uses AngularJS and Material Design frameworks, indicating a modern but basic technical infrastructure. However, the absence of privacy policies, cookie consent mechanisms, and contact details suggests limited digital maturity and compliance. Security posture cannot be fully assessed due to lack of security headers and SSL details, but no blocking or WAF challenges were detected, indicating accessibility. Overall, the site presents a low-risk profile but requires significant improvements in transparency, compliance, and security to enhance trust and professionalism.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
100/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…
  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching firmaren.sk

This scan found 17 issues across 4 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
35
Email security
100
DNS health
70
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
100
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention firmaren.sk, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
1,600
Employees
0
Customers
1,600
Third parties
0
Weak passwords
11%

5 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for firmaren.sk.

Select it in the checkout above.

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to minimal content and lack of explicit business information, detailed business intelligence is limited. The site likely targets local Slovak users given the language and domain. The business model and market position are unclear, with no evident partnerships or certifications. The use of AngularJS suggests a focus on interactive web applications, possibly for business listings or services. Growth indicators and revenue streams cannot be determined from the available data. The absence of contact and policy information limits customer trust and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The security posture of the website is weak based on the available data. There is no evidence of HTTPS enforcement or security headers, which are critical for protecting user data and preventing common web attacks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is present, and no security certifications are mentioned. The lack of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and related regulations. No exposed vulnerabilities or malicious indicators were detected, but the site would benefit from a comprehensive security audit and implementation of best practices.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate to secure data transmission.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  3. Publish contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer and security incident reporting.
  4. Incorporate security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
AngularJS, Material Design
Frameworks
AngularJS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is minimal and mostly technical CSS and AngularJS framework code.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  3. No contact information such as emails, phone numbers, or addresses detected.
  4. No security headers or SSL configuration details available from provided data.
  5. No external links or social media links detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. No forms or data collection fields detected in the provided content.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. Content is business-oriented but lacks descriptive text or metadata.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; site is accessible.
  10. WHOIS data is privacy protected, limiting registrant transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website utilizes AngularJS and Material Design CSS frameworks, indicating a single-page application approach with modern UI components. The technical implementation appears basic with no detected CMS or advanced hosting details. Performance is likely moderate given the frameworks used, but no explicit performance metrics are available. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, with room for improvement. SEO optimization is minimal due to lack of meta tags and structured data. The site would benefit from modernization to newer frameworks and enhanced technical SEO and accessibility features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with firmaren.sk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firmaren.sk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.