a(a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
b(b) Incident handling: One indicator
c(c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
d(d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
e(e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
f(f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
g(g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
h(h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
i(i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
j(j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside
Partly checked
One indicator
Not visible from outside
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
Priority findings
5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
SSL/TLS
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
High
Weak Protocols Supported
Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1
What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions
Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.
High
Missing Strict-Transport-Security header
Forces HTTPS connections
What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"
This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
Daily monitoring
Recommended
€25per month
TLS certificates and expiry
DNS records
SPF, DKIM and DMARC
Security headers
GDPR and NIS2 posture
Exposed services
Third-party trackers
Security score drift
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Results by check
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
How this score is calculated
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
55
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
63
Not counted
NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
The certificate is not trusted by browsers
The website is not served over HTTPS
A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
The page loads a script from a compromised source
The domain registration has expired
SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Critical0–25
High26–49
Medium50–75
Low76–100
Breach exposure
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Dark web exposure
Add-on
Leaked records that mention firesharp.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for firesharp.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Business context
Business profile
Firesharp Engineering Ltd holds a stable market position as a trusted fire protection service provider with over 16 years of experience. Their business model focuses on service delivery and maintenance with digital documentation and compliance tracking. The company targets UK businesses requiring fire safety solutions, leveraging accreditations like SafeContractor to enhance trust. The website's content and contact details support a credible and professional operation, though the absence of detailed privacy and security policies suggests an opportunity to strengthen regulatory compliance and customer assurance. No partnerships or subsidiaries were identified from the website content.
Security posture
The website employs HTTPS and a CAPTCHA-protected contact form, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the lack of explicit security headers and absence of published security or incident response policies highlight areas for enhancement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. The cookie consent mechanism aligns with GDPR requirements, but the privacy policy is missing, reducing overall privacy compliance. The WHOIS lookup failure is attributed to a query on the subdomain rather than the registered domain, not indicating malicious intent. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with recommendations to formalize policies and implement additional HTTP security headers.
Recommendations
Publish a comprehensive privacy policy page to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, Strict-Transport-Security, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
Establish and publish an incident response policy and contact channel for security issues.
Add a vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
Regularly audit third-party scripts and plugins to ensure no vulnerable libraries are in use.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Business
Company
Firesharp Engineering Ltd
Description
Firesharp Engineering Ltd, established in 2008, provides fire protection services including fire alarms, fire extinguishers, fire door inspections, and emergency lighting. They serve diverse sectors such as power generation, care environments, and small businesses, focusing on long-term partnerships.
Key services
Fire Alarms - Design, Installation, Commissioning, Maintenance, Fire Extinguishers - Design, Installation, Commissioning, Maintenance, Fire Door Inspections/Surveys, Emergency Lighting - Design, Installation, Commissioning, Maintenance
Use of SafeContractor accreditation as trust signal
Analytics and tracking
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic
Advertising
Marketing tools
Google Translate
Transparency
basic
Site quality
Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high
Key observations
Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
Content is professionally presented and relevant to fire protection services.
Contact information is complete and includes phone, email, physical address, and contact form.
Privacy and cookie policies are minimal; cookie consent mechanism is present.
No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
WHOIS data is unavailable due to query on subdomain; domain likely registered as 'firesharp.co.uk'.
Use of modern WordPress CMS with Gutenberg and Go-X plugins.
Security best practices partially implemented; HTTPS and CAPTCHA present.
Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram.
No analytics or tracking scripts detected beyond Google Translate.
Standards and sources
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with firesharp.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review firesharp.co.uk.