Skip to main content

Security report for finestrasolution.com

Finestra Solution SIA · Manufacturing · Latvia

High risk. 10 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Finestra Solution SIA is a Latvian-based company specializing in the design, manufacture, delivery, installation, and servicing of aluminum and steel constructions, including windows, doors, facades, and custom glass solutions. The company targets construction professionals and private clients, positioning itself as a regional manufacturer with a focus on quality and modern technology. The website is professionally designed, multilingual, and provides clear contact information, supporting its business credibility. Technically, the site uses modern web technologies including Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking, and enforces HTTPS with CSRF protection, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies and lack of visible security headers suggest room for improvement in compliance and security posture. The WHOIS data is notably missing or inaccessible, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy despite the professional appearance of the website. Overall, the site is functional and trustworthy from a user perspective but would benefit from enhanced transparency and security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

10 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching finestrasolution.com

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
30
Email security
65
DNS health
75
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
35
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company operates in the manufacturing sector focused on steel and aluminum construction products, serving both B2B and B2C markets primarily in Latvia. Its business model revolves around custom fabrication and installation services, supported by EU project funding which indicates growth and development initiatives. The presence of a Facebook page suggests active engagement with customers and marketing efforts. The company appears small in size with no parent or subsidiary companies identified. The website content and structure support a professional image, though the lack of WHOIS data and privacy policies may impact trust for some stakeholders. There is no evidence of partnerships or related domains beyond social media presence.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a baseline security posture with HTTPS enabled and CSRF tokens implemented, which protects user interactions. However, the absence of key security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security robustness. No vulnerability disclosures or incident response contacts are provided, limiting transparency in security management. The use of third-party analytics scripts introduces moderate tracking but no visible mitigation or privacy controls are evident. The missing WHOIS data is a notable risk factor, potentially indicating domain registration issues or privacy obfuscation. Overall, the security posture is moderate but could be significantly improved by adding security headers, privacy policies, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to improve GDPR compliance and user trust.
  2. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  3. Establish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file with clear contact information for security incidents.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS registration details to ensure domain legitimacy and transparency.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide clear cookie consent mechanisms to improve user experience and compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Finestra Solution SIA
Registration number
Nr. SKV-L-2023/255
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Finestra Solution SIA
Description
Finestra Solution designs, manufactures, delivers, installs, and services aluminum and steel constructions including windows, doors, facades, and other custom solutions using modern technologies and individual client approaches.
Key services
Steel constructions, Aluminum constructions, Facades, Custom glass solutions, Installation and servicing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Google Fonts (Roboto), JavaScript, CSS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta tag

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is in Latvian with multi-language support (LV, EN, SE).
  3. No privacy or cookie policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is clearly presented including email, phone, and physical address.
  5. No visible forms collecting personal data on the homepage; contact forms likely on contact page but not included in provided HTML.
  6. Use of Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking.
  7. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  8. No certifications or security frameworks mentioned.
  9. WHOIS data missing or domain unregistered according to raw WHOIS output, which is unusual.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern front-end stack with Google Fonts, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager for tracking and performance monitoring. The HTML is well-structured with proper meta tags for SEO and Open Graph for social sharing. The site is mobile optimized and supports multiple languages. However, no CMS or backend platform is explicitly detected. Performance appears moderate with optimized images and deferred JavaScript loading. The absence of visible security headers and privacy policies indicates technical debt in compliance and security best practices. Hosting provider details are not discernible from the provided data. Overall, the technical implementation is solid but could benefit from enhanced security and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with finestrasolution.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review finestrasolution.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.