Skip to main content

Security report for filthyoldies.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

67/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Filthy Oldies is an adult entertainment website specializing in mature pornographic photo galleries, updated daily with thousands of images featuring older models. The site targets an adults-only audience interested in mature and explicit content. It operates as a niche player within the adult content industry, linking to a network of partner adult sites to expand its reach. The business model is based on free content distribution likely monetized through advertising or affiliate partnerships. Technically, the site uses basic web technologies including JavaScript and CSS, with Cloudflare DNS services but lacks advanced CMS or modern frameworks. The site shows moderate performance and basic mobile optimization but lacks accessibility features and SEO sophistication. Security posture is weak with no visible HTTPS enforcement, no security headers, and no DNSSEC enabled, exposing it to potential risks. Privacy compliance is poor with no privacy or cookie policies, and no GDPR indicators. The absence of contact information and business transparency reduces trustworthiness. Overall, the site is functional but requires significant improvements in security, privacy, and compliance to enhance credibility and user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filthyoldies.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
67

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website occupies a niche segment in the adult entertainment market focusing on mature content, appealing to a specific demographic of adult users. Its competitive advantage lies in a large archive of mature galleries and daily updates, supported by a network of related adult sites. The business likely generates revenue through advertising and affiliate marketing, though no direct monetization details are visible. The lack of corporate transparency and contact details suggests a low-profile operational model common in adult content sites. The partnership ecosystem is extensive, linking to numerous related adult domains, indicating a strategy of cross-promotion within the mature content niche. Growth indicators are limited due to lack of public business data, but the domain age and content volume suggest established operations.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options exposes users to risks including man-in-the-middle attacks and clickjacking. DNSSEC is not enabled, which could allow DNS spoofing attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating non-compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations. There is no evidence of incident response readiness or security contact channels. The site does not appear to use modern security frameworks or best practices. These gaps pose risks to user data protection and overall site integrity.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all user connections.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Enable DNSSEC to protect DNS integrity.
  4. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information and establish incident response channels for security issues.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Filthy Oldies is the one of the most discussed mature sites! Here at Filthy Oldies we give you 1000's of old models! We update Filthy Oldies daily to meet your needs! Mature Porn is not just porn. It's a way of life. Most of our visitors keep coming back daily.
Key services
free mature porn photo galleries, daily content updates, links to partner adult sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, CSS, HTML, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content site specializing in mature pornographic images.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the homepage HTML.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected.
  4. Multiple external partner adult sites linked, indicating a network of related adult content sites.
  5. No visible security headers or advanced security measures detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts identified in the provided HTML.
  7. Content is explicit and targeted strictly to adults; no age verification present.
  8. Website uses Cloudflare DNS but no indication of Cloudflare WAF or challenge.
  9. WHOIS data shows domain is stable and long-lived but lacks registrant transparency.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML, CSS, and JavaScript without evidence of a modern CMS or framework. It uses Cloudflare for DNS but does not leverage Cloudflare's WAF or security features. The site loads a small number of scripts, including a custom bookmark script and a tracking pixel-like image request, but no major analytics or advertising scripts are detected. The site structure is simple with multiple galleries linked via static URLs. Performance is moderate with no explicit optimization or accessibility features. SEO is basic with meta description and canonical tags but lacks structured data or Open Graph tags. Mobile optimization is minimal with no responsive design elements detected. The technical debt is moderate, and modernization opportunities include adopting a CMS, improving mobile responsiveness, and enhancing SEO and accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filthyoldies.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filthyoldies.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.