Skip to main content

Security report for filogroup.cz

Filogroup a.s. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 3 other checks.

Security score

43/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Filogroup a.s. is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in cotton yarn production with a long-standing tradition in the textile industry. The website presents the company as stable and focused on quality yarn products, targeting a general audience including potential employees. The business model centers on manufacturing and sales within the textile sector, positioning itself as an established player in the Czech market. The website content is relevant and professionally presented, though limited in scope regarding direct contact information and corporate disclosures. Technically, the website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with common plugins such as Contact Form 7 and jQuery UI. It uses HTTPS with a good SSL configuration but lacks modern security headers and some accessibility features. Performance is moderate, and mobile optimization is basic. SEO is adequately addressed through meta tags and structured data. External dependencies include marketing/tracking services like Leady and common CDN providers. From a security perspective, the site benefits from HTTPS but lacks visible security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies, which are important for GDPR compliance. The WHOIS data is missing, which raises concerns about domain legitimacy and trustworthiness. No direct contact emails or phone numbers are provided, limiting transparency. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. Overall, the website is functional and business-appropriate but has gaps in privacy compliance, security best practices, and domain legitimacy verification. Strategic improvements in these areas would enhance trust and security posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filogroup.cz

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
43

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention filogroup.cz, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for filogroup.cz right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Filogroup a.s. operates in the manufacturing sector, specifically textile production of cotton yarns. The company targets the Czech market with a focus on quality and tradition. The business model is product-centric, relying on manufacturing and direct sales. The website indicates a medium-sized enterprise with a stable market position but limited digital presence in terms of direct customer engagement or detailed corporate information. The absence of WHOIS data and limited contact details suggest potential areas for improvement in transparency and digital trust. No partnerships or subsidiaries are indicated on the site. Marketing efforts include use of tracking and retargeting tools but no visible affiliate or partner programs. Growth indicators or revenue streams are not disclosed.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL certificate, ensuring encrypted communication. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which help mitigate common web attacks. The WordPress version is outdated (4.9.26), which may expose the site to known vulnerabilities if not patched. No sensitive data is exposed in the HTML content, and forms are implemented via Contact Form 7, but no explicit security measures like CAPTCHA or input validation details are visible. Privacy and cookie policies are absent, indicating non-compliance with GDPR requirements. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided, limiting the ability to handle security incidents effectively. Overall, the security posture is moderate but requires improvements to meet best practices and regulatory compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Update WordPress core and all plugins to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection against common attacks.
  4. Provide clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Establish and publish an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure policy to demonstrate security maturity and readiness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Filogroup a.s.
Description
Přádelná bavlněných přízí Choceň. Naše příze pro vaší spokojenost. Filogroup a.s. je dlouhodobě stabilní ryze česká firma s dlouholetou tradicí v oblasti textilní výroby.
Key services
Cotton yarn production
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 2.2.4, WordPress 4.9.26, Contact Form 7, jQuery UI, Responsive Lightbox Swipebox, Font Awesome, Google Fonts (Source Sans Pro)
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
70/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
Leady
Tracking pixels
Leady
Marketing tools
Leady
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. WHOIS data is missing or unavailable, which is unusual and reduces trust.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. Contact information is limited to a job application form; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  5. Website uses outdated WordPress version (4.9.26) which may pose security risks.
  6. HTTPS is enabled and favicon and meta tags are properly configured.
  7. External links include marketing/tracking service leady.com and common CDN domains.
  8. No social media links or company emails explicitly found.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data.
  10. No certifications or security policies mentioned on site.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress 4.9.26 with plugins including Contact Form 7, jQuery UI, and Responsive Lightbox Swipebox. It uses jQuery 2.2.4 and Google Fonts (Source Sans Pro). The site loads external scripts from leady.com for marketing/tracking purposes. The HTML structure is valid with proper meta tags and Open Graph data, including JSON-LD structured data describing the organization and website. Performance is moderate with no explicit speed optimization detected. Mobile optimization is basic but functional. Accessibility features are minimal, with some localization for Czech language. SEO is supported by canonical tags and structured data but could be improved with richer content and metadata. Hosting provider is not identified from the data. No advanced frameworks or modern JavaScript libraries detected.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filogroup.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filogroup.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.