Skip to main content

Security report for filnasa.org

Other · Indonesia

Medium risk. 8 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

51/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website filnasa.org presents itself as Kembang128, an online provider of togel toto 4d gambling markets primarily targeting Indonesian users. The business claims to offer the most complete and official togel markets in Indonesia, focusing on lottery and slot games. However, the domain is very recently registered (December 2024) and lacks publicly disclosed registrant information, which raises questions about its establishment and credibility. The website content is minimal and primarily focused on gambling services with no visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies, nor any contact or security incident response information. Technically, the site uses JavaScript and Alibaba analytics scripts but lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, and there is no visible HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content. Overall, the site exhibits poor design quality, limited content relevance, and low trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
65/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filnasa.org

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
15
Email security
85
DNS health
70
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
65
Average
51

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Kembang128 operates in the online gambling sector, specifically targeting the Indonesian market with lottery and slot services. The business model appears to be a gambling market provider, likely monetizing through betting or membership fees. The market position is self-described as comprehensive and official, but the very recent domain registration and lack of transparency reduce confidence. There are no visible partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company information. The absence of contact details and business certifications further limits credibility. The site relies heavily on Alibaba's analytics and tracking infrastructure, indicating a focus on user tracking and marketing. The target audience is mature users interested in gambling. Growth indicators and strategic partnerships are not evident from the available data.

Security posture

The security posture of filnasa.org is weak. The domain lacks DNSSEC, and the website does not present any security headers such as Content Security Policy or X-Frame-Options. There is no visible HTTPS enforcement in the HTML content, although the WHOIS data does not specify SSL status. No privacy or cookie policies are present, and no incident response contacts are provided. The use of third-party analytics scripts from Alibaba introduces potential privacy concerns. The domain registration is transparent (no privacy protection), which is positive, but the very recent creation date and lack of security best practices reduce trust. Recommendations include enabling DNSSEC, implementing HTTPS with HSTS, adding security headers, and publishing privacy and security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security.
  2. Implement HTTPS with strict transport security (HSTS) to secure user connections.
  3. Add essential security headers such as Content Security Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with regulations and build user trust.
  5. Provide clear contact information including security incident response channels.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Kembang128 merupakan situs penyedia pasaran togel toto 4d terlengkap Kembang 128 menyediakan banyak pasaran togel toto 4d khusus untuk semua member Kembang128.
Key services
pasaran togel toto 4d, slot toto 5d
Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Ant Design Icons, Alibaba Analytics Scripts
Frameworks
Ant Design (icons)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
Alibaba Goldlog
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Alibaba analytics scripts
Marketing tools
Alibaba analytics, Goldlog tracking
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF
  2. Content is primarily gambling related (togel markets) targeting Indonesian users
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found
  4. No contact information or security policies disclosed
  5. Heavy use of Alibaba analytics and tracking scripts
  6. Domain is very new and registered via NameCheap without privacy protection
  7. No security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content
  8. Website design and content quality are poor and unprofessional
  9. No social media or external business contact links found
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses JavaScript with Ant Design icons and Alibaba's Goldlog analytics scripts. Hosting is provided by NameCheap, with domain registration also through NameCheap. The site shows moderate performance but poor mobile optimization and accessibility. SEO optimization is basic with meta tags present but no structured data or JSON-LD found. The site lacks a CMS indication and appears custom-built or minimal. External resources are loaded from Alibaba's CDN domains. There is no evidence of modern frameworks beyond Ant Design icons. The domain is very new, which may indicate technical immaturity or recent launch. The site lacks security best practices such as DNSSEC and security headers, and no HTTPS enforcement is visible in the HTML content.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filnasa.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filnasa.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.