Skip to main content

Security report for filmroellchen.eu

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

69/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website 'kleines Filmröllchen’s webbed site' is a personal creative portfolio and blog site representing an individual persona. It offers content such as projects, services, and links, targeting a general audience interested in personal and creative digital content. The site is hosted by netcup GmbH and uses modern web technologies including HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript modules, indicating a moderate level of technical maturity. The design is consistent and user-friendly with good navigation and mobile optimization. Security posture is moderate with HTTPS implied but lacking explicit security headers and formal policies. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may pose compliance risks. Overall, the site is safe, trustworthy, and well-maintained but could improve in privacy and security transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
15/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 27 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching filmroellchen.eu

This scan found 16 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Email security
70
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
15
Average
69

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a personal brand and content sharing platform without commercial business operations. It targets niche internet users interested in creative projects and personal blogging. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on personal expression and community engagement. The site leverages partnerships and community badges from various trusted domains, indicating a strong community presence. There is no evidence of revenue streams or formal business structure. The site’s market position is niche and personal, with a small scale and no parent or subsidiary companies. The lack of formal contact information and policies suggests a casual operational approach.

Security posture

The security posture is basic with HTTPS usage but no detected security headers or formal security policies. There are no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. The absence of privacy and cookie policies, security.txt, and incident response contacts indicates gaps in compliance and readiness. The site does not use tracking or advertising, reducing privacy risks. Recommendations include implementing security headers, privacy and cookie policies, and establishing incident response contacts to enhance trust and compliance.

Recommendations

  1. Implement a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide clear contact information including security and incident response contacts.
  4. Introduce a security.txt file and vulnerability disclosure policy to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Regularly audit and update scripts and dependencies to mitigate potential vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Personal website of kleines Filmröllchen, a terminally online cat girl persona who shares content including projects, services, blog, and links. The site appears to be a personal or creative portfolio rather than a commercial business.
Key services
Content sharing, Personal projects, Blogging, Links aggregation
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript (ES Modules)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
50/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS usage (implied by URLs)

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Personal creative website with a clear theme and persona.
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating potential compliance gaps.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly provided.
  4. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure found.
  5. Multiple external trusted links and badges indicating community involvement.
  6. No advertising or tracking detected.
  7. Good use of modern HTML5 and CSS with JavaScript modules.
  8. No CMS detected; likely a static or custom-built site.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a clean, modern tech stack with HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript ES modules. It is hosted by netcup GmbH, a reputable hosting provider. The site appears to be custom-built or static, with no CMS detected. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph data. There is no evidence of analytics or tracking services, which benefits privacy but limits marketing insights. Technical risks include lack of security headers and formal compliance mechanisms. Opportunities exist to enhance security posture and privacy compliance while maintaining the site's creative and personal nature.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with filmroellchen.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review filmroellchen.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.