Skip to main content

Security report for fienta.com

Fienta · Other · Finland

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

74/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fienta is an established Finnish online event ticketing platform founded in 2017, offering services such as event page creation, registration forms, ticket sales, and payment processing. The platform targets event organizers and ticket buyers primarily in Finland and holds a strong market position with positive user ratings. Technically, the website leverages modern technologies including Laravel, Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, and Cookiebot, indicating a mature digital infrastructure. The site is hosted behind Cloudflare DNS and CDN services, ensuring reliable performance and security. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforced, CSRF protection, and clientTransferProhibited domain status, although DNSSEC is not enabled and some security headers could be improved. Privacy compliance is well addressed with a comprehensive cookie consent mechanism via Cookiebot and a clear cookie policy, supporting GDPR adherence. However, explicit contact information, terms of service, and security policies are not readily found, which could be improved to enhance trust and compliance. Overall, the website is professional, secure, and compliant, with minor areas for enhancement in security headers and transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fienta.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
25
Email security
75
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
74

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fienta operates in the online ticketing sector, focusing on the Finnish market. Its business model centers on providing an easy-to-use platform for event organizers to create event pages and sell tickets with integrated payment processing. The company benefits from a consistent brand presence and positive customer feedback, which supports its competitive advantage. The integration of multiple marketing and analytics tools suggests a data-driven approach to customer engagement and growth. While no explicit partnerships or subsidiaries are identified, the use of third-party services like Cloudflare and Cookiebot indicates a reliance on established technology providers. The absence of visible contact details and formal policies may limit some user trust and regulatory transparency, representing potential growth areas.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security foundation with HTTPS enforced, CSRF token implementation, and domain transfer protection. The use of Cloudflare DNS and CDN adds a layer of protection against common web threats. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, ensuring compliance with privacy regulations. However, the lack of DNSSEC and some missing security headers such as HSTS and X-Frame-Options are notable gaps. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the provided content. The absence of a published security policy or incident response contact limits transparency in security governance. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by adopting additional headers, enabling DNSSEC, and publishing security-related policies.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to strengthen DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement additional HTTP security headers such as HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  4. Add a publicly accessible vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  5. Include explicit business contact information and terms of service to improve transparency and user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fienta
Description
Helpoin tapa luoda tapahtumasivuja rekisteröintilomakkeilla, lipunmyynnillä ja maksujen käsittelyllä.
Key services
Event page creation, Registration forms, Ticket sales, Payment processing
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Laravel, Cloudflare, Google Tag Manager, Intercom, Cookiebot, Senja Rich Snippet Widget
Frameworks
Laravel
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • ClientTransferProhibited domain status
  • CSRF token present in page
  • Cookie consent with opt-in mechanism

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Ads
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Meta Platforms, Inc., Google
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel
Marketing tools
Intercom, Cookiebot
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website uses modern consent management with Cookiebot
  2. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics services integrated
  3. No explicit contact emails or phone numbers found on main page
  4. No visible terms of service or security policy pages
  5. Good use of HTTPS and CSRF protection
  6. No DNSSEC enabled, which is a minor security gap
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Laravel framework with Statamic CMS components, hosted behind Cloudflare for DNS and CDN services. It integrates Google Tag Manager, Intercom for customer engagement, and Cookiebot for cookie consent management. The site uses modern front-end technologies with responsive design and SEO-friendly meta tags. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Accessibility features are basic but present. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a reliable user experience. Opportunities exist to improve security headers and DNS configurations to reduce technical risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fienta.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fienta.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.