Skip to main content

Security report for fieldinternational.com

Field International Group Ltd · Manufacturing · United Kingdom

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, SSL/TLS and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Field International Group Ltd is a medium-sized, UK-based manufacturing and engineering company specializing in Boeing aircraft tooling and ground support equipment. The company operates globally with multiple subsidiaries and regional offices across Europe, Asia, the Middle East, and North America. Their business model focuses on providing turnkey engineering solutions, manufacturing, calibration, repair, and maintenance services primarily targeting airline operators and MROs. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand presence with good content quality and clear navigation. Technically, the website is built on a modern WordPress platform using WooCommerce for product management and Elementor for design. It integrates SEO best practices via Yoast SEO and uses Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and performs moderately well, though some accessibility features could be enhanced. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. Cookie consent mechanisms and privacy policies indicate GDPR compliance, though explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not publicly available. Overall, the website and business demonstrate a high level of credibility and trustworthiness, supported by consistent WHOIS data and clear company information. The absence of WAF or blocking mechanisms allows full content accessibility. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing a security policy, and improving accessibility compliance to further strengthen the security and compliance posture.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
60/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS encryption

      GDPR requires appropriate security measures for personal data

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate for HTTPS

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      No HTTPS Encryption

      Website does not use HTTPS encryption, making all data transmission vulnerable to interception

      What to do: Implement SSL/TLS certificate and redirect all HTTP traffic to HTTPS

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fieldinternational.com

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
60
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Field International Group holds a strong market position as a global supplier of aerospace tooling and ground support equipment, servicing major aircraft manufacturers and airline operators. Their competitive advantage lies in their global manufacturing footprint, comprehensive engineering services, and a broad product portfolio tailored for Boeing and Airbus aircraft. The company targets B2B customers such as airlines, MROs, and aerospace OEMs. Revenue streams likely include product sales, maintenance contracts, and engineering consultancy. The presence of multiple subsidiaries and regional offices indicates a well-established partnership ecosystem and operational scale. The website content and social media presence support a professional and growth-oriented business strategy.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enforced and no signs of exposed credentials or vulnerable libraries. Cookie consent and privacy compliance are well implemented, reflecting awareness of GDPR requirements. However, the lack of explicit security policies, incident response contacts, and vulnerability disclosure mechanisms suggests room for improvement in transparency and readiness. Security headers are not explicitly visible in the HTML but may be configured at the server level. No WAF or security challenge was detected, indicating open accessibility but also a need for robust backend protections. Overall, the security maturity is good but could be enhanced by formalizing policies and incident response channels.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and explicitly configure security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Referrer-Policy.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy page and provide incident response contact information (e.g., security@ or abuse@ email).
  3. Introduce a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting.
  4. Enhance website accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader compliance.
  5. Maintain regular updates of WordPress core, themes, and plugins to mitigate vulnerabilities.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Field International Group Ltd
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Field International Group Ltd
Description
Manufacturers and suppliers of Boeing aircraft tooling and ground support equipment. Providing turnkey engineering solutions.
Key services
Manufacture, calibration, repair and supply of aircraft tooling and ground support equipment, Engineering design and manufacturing solutions, Maintenance services for tooling and GSE
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.8.1, WooCommerce 9.9.3, Elementor 3.29.2, Yoast SEO, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Image Map Pro, WooCommerce Products Filter plugin, Cookie Law Info plugin, GTranslate plugin
Frameworks
WooCommerce, Elementor
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • Use of HTTPS
  • Cookie consent with opt-in/out
  • No exposed credentials or sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of security plugins (implied by cookie and analytics management)

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
Yoast SEO, GTranslate
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional B2B manufacturing and engineering service provider for aerospace tooling and GSE
  2. Multiple regional offices and subsidiaries with detailed contact info
  3. Compliant cookie consent and privacy policy mechanisms
  4. Use of modern WordPress ecosystem with WooCommerce and Elementor
  5. No signs of blocking or WAF challenge
  6. Good SEO and structured data implementation
  7. No visible security policy or incident response info publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website leverages a modern WordPress CMS with WooCommerce for e-commerce capabilities and Elementor for page building, indicating a flexible and scalable infrastructure. Integration of Yoast SEO and Google Analytics demonstrates attention to SEO and user behavior tracking. Performance is moderate with some optimization potential, especially in lazy loading and script management. The use of multiple plugins for cookie management, product filtering, and translation suggests a complex but well-integrated tech stack. Hosting provider details are not explicit, but the site uses HTTPS with valid certificates. Technical risks include potential plugin vulnerabilities and the need for enhanced security header configurations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fieldinternational.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fieldinternational.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.