Skip to main content

Security report for fibersurf.it

ASDASD srl · Telecommunications · Italy

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and Security headers.

Security score

39/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FiberSurf is a small regional Italian ISP specializing in FTTH fiber optic internet services, offering multiple subscription plans with unlimited data and telephone services. The company targets residential and small business customers primarily in the Veneto region. The website provides comprehensive service details, customer testimonials, and contact information, reflecting a professional and customer-focused business model. Technically, the site uses common web technologies such as Bootstrap, jQuery, and tracking tools like Google Analytics and Facebook Pixel, but suffers from slow load times and lacks modern security configurations. Critically, the absence of a valid SSL certificate and HTTPS support significantly undermines the security posture and user trust. Privacy and cookie policies are present and appear GDPR compliant, though no explicit security or incident response policies are found. Overall, FiberSurf presents as a legitimate, small ISP with room for technical and security improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
0/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fibersurf.it

This scan found 20 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
50
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
80
Network security
40
GDPR outside view
0
Average
39

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FiberSurf operates as a niche ISP focusing on fiber optic internet in select Italian provinces, leveraging competitive pricing and transparent plans. Their business model includes free router loans and telephone number portability, appealing to customers seeking high-speed internet with reliable support. The presence of extensive customer testimonials indicates a strong local reputation and customer satisfaction. The company maintains partnerships with related domains for customer management and corporate information. Growth potential exists through expanding coverage and improving digital presence. However, technical shortcomings such as lack of HTTPS and slow website performance could hinder customer acquisition and retention.

Security posture

The website's security posture is weak due to the lack of HTTPS and a valid SSL certificate, exposing users to potential data interception and undermining trust. No security headers or advanced protections like HSTS or OCSP stapling are implemented. While no critical vulnerabilities like Heartbleed or POODLE are detected, the absence of encryption is a critical issue. Privacy policies are in place, but no incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. The extensive use of third-party tracking scripts increases the attack surface and privacy risks. Immediate remediation of SSL/TLS configuration and implementation of security best practices are essential to improve security maturity.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to enable HTTPS across the entire site.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Enable HSTS with preload and includeSubDomains to enforce secure connections.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process.
  5. Optimize website performance to reduce load times and improve user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
ASDASD srl
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a standard technology stack with Bootstrap for responsive design, jQuery for interactivity, and Font Awesome for icons. It integrates Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and Funnelytics for tracking and marketing analytics. Hosting is provided by server-housing.it with DNS configured accordingly. However, the site lacks HTTPS support, uses an invalid SSL certificate, and has no modern TLS protocols enabled, which is a significant technical deficiency. The page load time is slow (over 11 seconds) with a large page size (~700KB) and many resources (93). Accessibility and SEO optimizations are basic, with room for improvement in meta tags and structured data. Overall, the technical infrastructure supports the business but requires modernization and security hardening.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fibersurf.it. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fibersurf.it.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.