Skip to main content

Security report for fiberring.com

fiberring.com · Telecommunications · Netherlands

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fiberring is a specialized telecommunications company providing metro fiber network connectivity and internet access services primarily in and around Amsterdam. Their offerings include Direct Internet Access, IP Transit, Metro Ethernet, Wavelength, and Dark Fiber services targeting IT and cloud service providers. The company emphasizes flexible networking, reliability, fast provisioning, and high performance. The website is professionally designed using WordPress with modern plugins and technologies, featuring comprehensive service descriptions and partner logos. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant, with contact information readily available. However, WHOIS data for the domain is missing, raising concerns about domain registration legitimacy. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and reCAPTCHA usage, but lacks explicit security headers and incident response information. Overall, the site is trustworthy and business-focused but would benefit from improved domain registration transparency and enhanced security practices.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

  4. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • High

      High-Risk Service Exposed: FTP

      Port 21 (FTP) is publicly accessible - FTP - Often unencrypted file transfer

      What to do: Consider restricting access to FTP or implementing strong authentication

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fiberring.com

This scan found 18 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
55
Email security
85
DNS health
90
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
80
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fiberring operates as a small-sized telecommunications provider focused on metro fiber network services in Amsterdam. Their business model revolves around providing high-speed, reliable fiber connectivity to data centers and service providers. The company maintains partnerships with major carriers such as Arelion, Tata Communications, Cogent, and Eurofiber, enhancing their network reach and service quality. The website content and service offerings indicate a niche market positioning with competitive advantages in fast provisioning and multi-route network architecture. The presence of detailed policies and contact forms suggests a mature operational approach. However, the absence of WHOIS registration data is a notable anomaly that should be investigated to confirm domain ownership and legitimacy.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with a valid SSL configuration and uses Google reCAPTCHA to protect forms, indicating a baseline security posture. Cookie consent mechanisms are implemented, supporting privacy compliance. However, no security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, or X-Frame-Options were detected, which are recommended to enhance protection against common web attacks. There is no visible security policy or incident response contact information, which could hinder effective vulnerability reporting and response. The lack of WHOIS data also raises concerns about domain legitimacy, which is a security risk factor. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing additional headers, publishing security policies, and verifying domain registration.

Recommendations

  1. Implement standard security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen web security.
  2. Publish a dedicated security policy and incident response contact information to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and improve trust.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and legitimacy.
  4. Regularly audit and update WordPress plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Consider adding a security.txt file to provide clear security contact details and disclosure guidelines.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
fiberring.com
Description
The FiberRing metro fiber network provides 10 Mbps to 10 Gbps connections between the major data centers around Amsterdam. Fast provisioning and flexible.
Key services
Direct Internet Access, IP Transit, Metro Ethernet, Wavelength, Dark Fiber
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, Contact Form 7, Google reCAPTCHA, Google Tag Manager, jQuery, Bootstrap, Select2
Frameworks
WordPress
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Google reCAPTCHA on forms
  • Cookie consent banner

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and professional design.
  2. WHOIS data is missing, which is unusual and may indicate domain registration issues.
  3. Privacy and cookie policies are present and GDPR compliant.
  4. Contact information is comprehensive and includes phone, email, address, and forms.
  5. No explicit security policy or incident response information found.
  6. Website uses modern WordPress plugins and technologies.
  7. No adult or questionable content detected.
  8. Google Analytics and Tag Manager are used for tracking with consent banner.
  9. No security headers detected in provided data; recommend adding for improved security.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS using popular plugins such as Yoast SEO, WPBakery Page Builder, Slider Revolution, and Contact Form 7. It integrates Google Tag Manager and Google Analytics for tracking and marketing purposes, with a GDPR-compliant cookie consent banner. The site uses jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend functionality and styling. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. The site structure includes well-formed meta tags and JSON-LD structured data for SEO. However, no hosting provider information was identified, and no advanced security headers were detected. The technical stack is modern but could benefit from enhanced security configurations and performance optimizations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 65/100Medium27 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fiberring.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fiberring.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.