Skip to main content

Security report for fia.org.au

Other · Australia

Medium risk. 6 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website www.fia.org.au is a professional online presence for an Australian organization likely involved in fundraising or non-profit activities. The site is built on the Salesforce Experience Cloud platform, leveraging Salesforce Lightning components and integrating multiple payment gateways such as Stripe, PayPal, and Adyen. It also uses popular analytics and marketing tools including Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag, indicating a mature digital marketing approach. The website content is accessible and well-structured, with good mobile optimization and a consistent branding approach. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with a strong SSL configuration and implements a restrictive Content-Security-Policy header. However, other common security headers are missing, and no explicit privacy or cookie policies were found in the provided content, which may impact privacy compliance. The WHOIS data is privacy protected, which is common for non-profit organizations, and no suspicious patterns were detected. No WAF or blocking mechanisms were identified, allowing full content access. Overall, the website demonstrates a solid technical foundation and a moderate to good security posture. The lack of visible contact information and privacy policies suggests areas for improvement in transparency and compliance. The site is safe for general audiences with no adult or questionable content detected.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, LinkedIn, YouTube, Google APIs, Google Ads

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      SSL Certificate Expires Soon

      SSL certificate expires in 27 days

      What to do: Renew SSL certificate before expiration

      • NIS2 21(2)(h)
      • IR 2024/2690 9.2(c): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 9.2(c): Cryptography
      • NIST SC-17: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-17: Public Key Infrastructure Certificates

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fia.org.au

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
65
Security headers
70
Email security
70
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The organization behind www.fia.org.au appears to be a medium-sized Australian entity focused on fundraising and non-profit sectors. The business model likely revolves around membership services, training, events, and fundraising support. The use of Salesforce Experience Cloud suggests a sophisticated CRM and community engagement strategy. The integration of multiple payment processors indicates active financial transactions, possibly for membership fees or event registrations. The target audience includes fundraising professionals and non-profit organizations in Australia. The website's market position is consistent with a specialized industry association or institute. No parent or subsidiary companies were identified. The partnership ecosystem includes major payment and analytics providers, enhancing operational capabilities.

Security posture

The website exhibits a good security posture with enforced HTTPS and a well-defined Content-Security-Policy. However, the absence of other security headers such as X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security reduces the overall security hardening. No exposed sensitive data or vulnerable libraries were detected in the provided content. The site lacks explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information, which could improve security readiness. Privacy compliance is limited due to missing privacy and cookie policies. The use of reputable third-party services for payments and analytics adds trust but also requires careful data protection management. Overall, the security maturity is moderate with room for improvement in policy transparency and header implementation.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  2. Implement additional security headers including X-Frame-Options, X-XSS-Protection, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Provide explicit contact information for security incident response and vulnerability reporting.
  4. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards for broader user inclusivity.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerabilities are introduced.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Salesforce Lightning, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag, Stripe, PayPal SDK, Adyen Checkout, Google reCAPTCHA, YouTube iframe API
Frameworks
Salesforce Lightning Aura Framework
Platforms
Salesforce Community Cloud
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • Content-Security-Policy header present with restrictive directives
  • HTTPS enforced

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, LinkedIn Ads, Facebook Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag
Marketing tools
Salesforce Marketing Cloud
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built on Salesforce Experience Cloud platform with extensive use of Salesforce Lightning components.
  2. No WHOIS registrant details available due to privacy protection.
  3. No explicit privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found in the provided content.
  4. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in the HTML content provided.
  5. Strong use of third-party payment and analytics services including Stripe, PayPal, Adyen, Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, and LinkedIn Insight Tag.
  6. Content is professional and targeted at fundraising professionals or organizations in Australia.
  7. No signs of adult or questionable content.
  8. Security headers are limited but Content-Security-Policy is present and restrictive.
  9. HTTPS is enforced with good SSL configuration.
  10. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Salesforce Experience Cloud using the Lightning Aura Framework, indicating a modern and scalable platform. It integrates multiple payment gateways (Stripe, PayPal, Adyen) and uses advanced analytics and marketing tools (Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel, LinkedIn Insight Tag). The Content-Security-Policy is comprehensive, restricting resource loading to trusted domains. Performance is moderate, with asynchronous loading of scripts and responsive design for mobile devices. However, accessibility features are basic and could be improved. SEO optimization is present but basic, with standard meta tags and Google Analytics integration. The technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from enhanced security headers and privacy compliance mechanisms.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fia.org.au. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fia.org.au.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.