Skip to main content

Security report for fhyanbao.com

Other · N/a

Partial score · DNS & email only

62/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website fhyanbao.com is currently inaccessible, returning a 502 Bad Gateway error served by nginx, indicating a server-side issue preventing content delivery. The domain is registered with Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. d/b/a HiChina since October 2022, which is consistent and legitimate, but the lack of accessible content limits any meaningful business or security analysis. No metadata, business information, contact details, or compliance policies are present in the accessible data. The technical infrastructure appears minimal with nginx as the web server, hosted likely on Alibaba Cloud, but performance and security posture cannot be fully assessed due to the error. Security posture is weak given the absence of security headers and unknown SSL status. Overall, the site is not currently functional, resulting in a low AI score and limited trustworthiness.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

    • High

      No SPF record found

      SPF helps prevent email spoofing

      What to do: Add SPF record: "v=spf1 include:_spf.yourmailprovider.com ~all"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fhyanbao.com

This scan found 21 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Email security
40
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
40
Average
62

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Due to the lack of accessible content, no business intelligence can be derived. The domain age suggests a relatively new entity, but no information about market positioning, services, or business model is available. No partnerships, certifications, or trust indicators are present. The absence of contact information and policies further limits credibility and business insights.

Security posture

The security posture is poor as the site does not present any security headers or visible HTTPS status. The 502 error indicates server instability or misconfiguration. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is available. The domain registration is consistent and not privacy protected, which is positive, but the lack of accessible content and security best practices reduces overall security confidence.

Recommendations

  1. Resolve the 502 Bad Gateway server error to restore website accessibility.
  2. Enable HTTPS and configure proper SSL/TLS certificates to secure communications.
  3. Implement standard security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Publish privacy policy, cookie policy, and terms of service to improve compliance and user trust.
  5. Add clear contact information and business details to enhance credibility and support.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

None detected. Website returns a 502 Bad Gateway error page served by nginx, indicating server-side error, not a WAF or security challenge. These observations may be incomplete. For a fuller analysis, contact guard@offseq.com.

Business

Content quality
poor
Branding
inconsistent

Technology

Stack
nginx
Performance
slow
Mobile
poor
Accessibility
poor
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
20/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
poor
User experience
poor
Content relevance
poor
Navigation
poor
Professionalism
poor
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is currently inaccessible due to 502 Bad Gateway error.
  2. No metadata, forms, scripts, or business content available for analysis.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  4. No contact information or social media links present.
  5. No security headers or HTTPS information available from provided data.
  6. Domain is registered with a reputable registrar and is active but content is unavailable.
  7. No advertising or analytics technologies detected.
  8. Content safety is rated safe due to lack of content.
  9. Analysis incomplete due to server error blocking content access.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is hosted on infrastructure managed by Alibaba Cloud Computing Ltd. with nginx as the web server. The current 502 Bad Gateway error suggests backend server or gateway issues that prevent content delivery. No CMS, frameworks, or analytics technologies are detected. The site lacks metadata and SEO optimization. Mobile optimization and accessibility cannot be assessed due to lack of content. The technical stack is minimal and requires modernization and stabilization to support business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fhyanbao.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fhyanbao.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.