Skip to main content

Security report for ffboxe.com

Fédération Française de Boxe · Government · France

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

54/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The Fédération Française de Boxe (FFBoxe) is the official French boxing federation, serving as the national governing body for amateur and professional boxing in France. The website provides comprehensive information about boxing practice, training, professional boxing, teams, and federation governance. It targets athletes, clubs, officials, and boxing enthusiasts in France. The federation is positioned as a key sports organization with over 60,000 licensed members, offering services such as licensing, training certifications, event organization, and information dissemination. Technically, the website is built on WordPress using Oxygen Builder, with modern JavaScript libraries like Alpine.js and jQuery. It employs SEO best practices with Yoast SEO and uses Matomo for analytics, indicating a moderate level of digital maturity. The site is mobile optimized and provides a good user experience with clear navigation and professional design. From a security perspective, the site uses HTTPS with good SSL configuration but lacks explicit security headers and publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure information. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is addressed with visible privacy and cookie policies, including consent mechanisms, aligning with GDPR requirements. Overall, the site is trustworthy and professional, though the absence of WHOIS data for the domain www.ffboxe.com is a concern that warrants verification. The domain may be newly registered or privacy protected, which is unusual for an official federation. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, publishing incident response details, and verifying domain registration to strengthen trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ffboxe.com

This scan found 22 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
35
Average
54

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FFBoxe operates as a non-profit government-affiliated sports federation in France, focusing on boxing. It holds a strong market position as the official body for boxing, with a large membership base and extensive services including training, certification, and event management. The federation leverages partnerships with related organizations such as FMMAF and maintains an active social media presence across major platforms. The business model centers on membership fees, training programs, and event organization. Growth indicators include digital engagement and certification achievements like Qualiopi. The federation's ecosystem includes regional committees, training sectors, and professional boxing leagues, reflecting a mature organizational structure.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate to good security posture with HTTPS enforced and no visible sensitive data leaks. However, the lack of security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No public security or incident response policies were found, which could hinder timely vulnerability management and user trust. The use of modern plugins and frameworks suggests regular updates, but explicit confirmation is absent. Privacy policies and cookie consent mechanisms indicate compliance with GDPR, though no dedicated security contact or vulnerability disclosure page is present. Overall, the security maturity is adequate but could be improved with enhanced headers and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection to strengthen browser security.
  2. Publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy with clear contact channels to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Verify and publicly confirm domain registration details to enhance legitimacy and trustworthiness.
  4. Regularly audit and update all plugins and themes to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance accessibility features to improve usability for all users and comply with standards.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fédération Française de Boxe
Description
la Fédération Française de Boxe (FFBoxe) est une fédération olympique forte de plus de 60 000 licenciés.
Key services
Licensing and membership management, Training and certification, Event and competition organization, Information dissemination
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Oxygen Builder, jQuery, Alpine.js, Ajax Search Pro, Swiper, Owl Carousel, Yoast SEO
Frameworks
Oxygen Builder
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of secure search forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Matomo
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Matomo
Marketing tools
Yoast SEO
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
good
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
good
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content in French language
  2. Strong branding and consistent use of federation logos and colors
  3. Comprehensive navigation menu with detailed sections about boxing practice, training, professional boxing, teams, federation info
  4. Use of modern web technologies and SEO best practices
  5. No signs of malware or phishing
  6. No explicit contact emails publicly listed, but contact forms and emergency phone numbers are available
  7. Social media presence is extensive and consistent with official federation
  8. No explicit security.txt or vulnerability disclosure page found
  9. WHOIS data missing, which is unusual and should be investigated
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Oxygen Builder, leveraging modern JavaScript libraries such as Alpine.js and jQuery. It uses Ajax Search Pro for enhanced search functionality and integrates Swiper and Owl Carousel for interactive UI components. SEO is managed via Yoast SEO plugin, with structured data implemented in JSON-LD format for rich search results. The site loads fonts from Google Fonts and assets from CDNs like jsDelivr and Cloudflare. Performance is moderate with room for optimization. Mobile responsiveness is good, but accessibility features are basic. No hosting provider information was detected. Overall, the technical infrastructure is modern and well-structured but could benefit from performance tuning and enhanced accessibility.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ffboxe.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ffboxe.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.