Skip to main content

Security report for fevia.be

Fevia · Manufacturing · Belgium

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fevia is a Belgian industry association focused on the food sector, providing its members with up-to-date information on legislation, trends, and innovations to support informed decision-making. The website is professionally designed using Drupal 10, featuring modern frontend technologies such as Alpine.js and integrated marketing tools like Google Tag Manager and CookieHub for cookie consent management. The site demonstrates good digital maturity with mobile optimization, accessibility features, and SEO best practices. Security posture is strong with HTTPS enforcement and appropriate security headers, although explicit security policies and incident response contacts are not published. The domain WHOIS data is restricted, showing a 'NOT ALLOWED' status, which limits transparency but is justified for privacy reasons in this business context. Overall, the website is trustworthy, well-maintained, and serves its target audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fevia.be

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
60
Email security
77
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Brand lookalikes

Add-on

Domains that imitate fevia.be and could be used for phishing or spoofed email, tracked in OffSeq Breach.

Tracked
9
Registered
9
Resolving
9
High or critical
0

Last checked 2026-06-20

Masked preview

  • fe••••.beMediuminsertion
  • ne•••.beMediumbitsquatting
  • de•••.beMediumbitsquatting

See the full lookalike list

A one-off add-on that lists up to 20 of the highest-risk lookalikes of fevia.be with registration, mail-server, certificate and DNS signals.

Select it in the checkout above.

Lookalike data refreshes continuously. Monitoring on Breach alerts you when a variant is registered, gains a mail server or starts serving HTTPS.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fevia occupies a leading position as a food industry federation in Belgium, targeting food companies and stakeholders. Its business model revolves around providing advocacy, information dissemination, and support services to its members. The website content and structure reflect a medium-sized organization with consistent branding and clear navigation. The absence of direct contact emails or phone numbers suggests a preference for controlled communication channels, likely via contact forms. The use of modern web technologies and compliance with privacy regulations indicate a commitment to digital professionalism and regulatory adherence. No suspicious domains or partners were identified, reinforcing the organization's credibility.

Security posture

The website exhibits a mature security posture with HTTPS enabled and multiple security headers implemented, including HSTS, X-Content-Type-Options, and Content-Security-Policy. Cookie consent mechanisms are in place, supporting GDPR compliance. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of published security policies or incident response information represents a gap in transparency and preparedness. The restricted WHOIS data limits domain registration visibility but does not raise immediate red flags given the professional nature of the site. Overall, the security posture is strong but could be enhanced by publishing explicit security and incident response policies.

Recommendations

  1. Publish a dedicated security policy page outlining security practices and compliance.
  2. Provide clear incident response contact information to improve transparency and readiness.
  3. Implement and publicize a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file.
  4. Consider providing verified company contact emails and phone numbers for improved trust.
  5. Regularly review and update cookie and privacy policies to maintain GDPR compliance.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fevia
Description
Fevia provides members with up-to-date information on legislation, trends, and innovations to help companies make the right decisions.
Key services
Information on legislation, Trends and innovations updates, Advocacy and support for food companies
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 10, Alpine.js, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Marketing tools
CookieHub
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation.
  2. No signs of WAF or security blocking.
  3. WHOIS data is restricted, limiting domain registration transparency.
  4. Site uses modern technologies and good security headers.
  5. Cookie consent and privacy policy are implemented.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found; contact form available.
  7. No explicit security or incident response policies published.
  8. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 10, leveraging Alpine.js for frontend interactivity and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. CookieHub is used for cookie consent management, indicating attention to privacy compliance. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and accessibility considerations. Performance is moderate, with optimized images and structured data for SEO. No hosting provider details were found in the HTML content. The technical stack is modern and well-maintained, supporting a professional user experience and effective content delivery.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fevia.be. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fevia.be.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.