Skip to main content

Security report for fetishgaze.com

Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 1 other check.

Security score

65/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FetishGaze.com operates as an adult dating platform combined with a large catalog of adult video content categorized by various fetishes and niche interests. The site targets an adults-only audience seeking casual encounters, romance, and fetish-related content. The business model revolves around providing free access to adult content and dating services, supported by advertising revenue from adult ad networks. The market position is niche within the adult entertainment and dating sector, with a focus on fetish communities. Technically, the website uses legacy technologies such as jQuery 1.11.0 and is hosted on servers associated with mojohost.com. The site shows basic mobile optimization and SEO practices but lacks modern frameworks or CMS identification. Performance is moderate with basic accessibility features. The site lacks comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, which impacts compliance and user trust. From a security perspective, the site lacks visible security headers and uses an outdated JavaScript library, increasing vulnerability risk. DNSSEC is not enabled, and the WHOIS data reveals suspicious domain registration details, including a future creation date inconsistent with the website's current availability. No GDPR compliance indicators or incident response contacts are present, and contact information is limited to a DMCA removal page link. Overall, the site presents moderate business functionality but has significant gaps in security posture and privacy compliance. The domain registration inconsistencies and lack of security best practices pose risks. Strategic improvements in security, privacy policies, and domain legitimacy verification are recommended to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fetishgaze.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
65
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
65

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FetishGaze.com targets a niche adult dating and fetish content market, offering categorized adult videos and dating services. The platform appears to rely on advertising revenue from adult ad networks and partnerships with numerous adult content sites. The absence of clear company information and minimal contact details suggest a small-scale operation. The extensive list of partner domains indicates a broad affiliate or partner ecosystem within the adult entertainment industry. Growth potential depends on improving trust and compliance to attract a wider user base and advertisers.

Security posture

The website's security maturity is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the use of an outdated jQuery library, lack of DNSSEC, absence of security headers, and no visible privacy or cookie policies. The WHOIS data raises legitimacy concerns due to a future domain creation date and minimal registrant information. No incident response or security contact channels are provided. These factors increase the risk of exploitation and reduce user trust. Compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations is not evident, exposing the business to potential legal risks.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC and improve domain registration transparency to enhance domain security and trust.
  2. Update all JavaScript libraries, especially jQuery, to current secure versions to mitigate vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to harden the website against common attacks.
  5. Establish clear incident response contacts and improve contact information availability to enhance user trust and compliance.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Description
Explore adult dating in a secure and judgment-free space. Our platform connects you with singles and couples seeking fun, romance, or casual encounters. With advanced privacy features, you can confidently pursue your desires. Sign up today and ignite your passion.
Key services
adult dating, adult video content categorized by fetish and niche interests
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.11.0
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
freexxxbase.com
Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
low

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult dating and adult content platform with extensive fetish categories.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the main page.
  3. Contact information limited to a DMCA/content removal contact page link; no direct emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Uses outdated jQuery library which may pose security risks.
  5. Multiple external partner domains linked, all adult content related.
  6. Advertising is served via freexxxbase.com iframes with sandbox attributes.
  7. No visible security headers or advanced security policies detected.
  8. Domain WHOIS data shows suspicious future creation date and minimal registrant info.
  9. No GDPR or privacy compliance indicators present.
  10. Website content is accessible with no WAF or blocking detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a legacy jQuery 1.11.0 library, which is outdated and may contain known vulnerabilities. The hosting provider appears to be Mojohost based on DNS nameservers. The site uses basic HTML and CSS with no detected CMS or modern frameworks. Mobile optimization is basic, and SEO practices are minimal but present. Advertising is integrated via sandboxed iframes from freexxxbase.com. No analytics or advanced tracking services were detected. The site lacks modern security headers and DNSSEC, indicating technical debt and potential security risks. Performance is moderate but could benefit from modernization and optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fetishgaze.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fetishgaze.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.