Skip to main content

Security report for feroplast.cz

FEROPLAST spol. s r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 2 other checks.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FEROPLAST spol. s r.o. is a Czech manufacturing company specializing in the production of wire-based products such as corporate and promotional stands, retail shelves, and other advertising elements. Established in 1999, the company holds a significant market position in the Czech Republic, serving large retail chains and multinational companies. In 2024, FEROPLAST became part of the ANACOT industrial group, signaling growth and stability. The website reflects a professional business presence with clear product offerings and contact information. Technically, the site uses modern JavaScript libraries like jQuery, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager, with a cookie consent mechanism compliant with GDPR. However, the CMS appears custom or unknown, and some security best practices like HTTP security headers are missing. The security posture is moderate, with no visible critical vulnerabilities but room for improvement in headers and incident response transparency. Overall, the website is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and trustworthy, supporting the company's business credibility.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feroplast.cz

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FEROPLAST operates in the manufacturing sector focused on wire products and retail equipment, targeting B2B customers such as supermarkets and retail chains. Its competitive advantage lies in long-term experience, ISO certification, and integration into the ANACOT group. The business model is manufacturing and direct sales with a focus on volume production and custom orders. The company’s website supports its market position with detailed product categories and multilingual support. Partnerships include the parent company ANACOT and web development by WebRex. Growth indicators include recent acquisition and integration into a larger industrial group. The company maintains a professional digital presence but lacks some advanced security disclosures.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a moderate security maturity level. It uses HTTPS for external resources and implements cookie consent with category-based opt-in, aligning with GDPR requirements. However, the absence of explicit HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces the overall security posture. No incident response or security contact information is published, which is a gap in transparency and readiness. Client-side form validation is present, but server-side validation is unknown. The use of third-party scripts like Google Analytics and imedia.cz retargeting introduces tracking but is managed with consent. Overall, the site is secure enough for its business purpose but could improve in header security and incident response visibility.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTP security headers including Content-Security-Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Publish a dedicated incident response or security contact page to improve transparency and readiness for security events.
  3. Ensure server-side validation of all forms to complement client-side checks and prevent injection attacks.
  4. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools for vulnerabilities and compliance with privacy regulations.
  5. Maintain and update SSL/TLS configurations to adhere to current best practices and avoid deprecated protocols.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FEROPLAST spol. s r.o.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FEROPLAST spol. s r.o.
Description
Společnost se zabývá výrobou firemních a propagačních stojanů, prodejních regálů a reklamních prvků, specializuje se na regály, stojany a pokladní zóny ve velkých množstvích. Dlouhodobě dodává pro velké prodejní řetězce a nadnárodní společnosti. V roce 2024 byla akvírována a začleněna do průmyslového koncernu ANACOT.
Key services
firemní stojany, prodejní regály, koše, vybavení kuchyní, vybavení prodejen
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.3.1, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Font Awesome, Lightbox JS, Cookie Consent by Osano
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
65/100
Good practices seen
  • Cookie consent with category-based opt-in
  • No exposed emails in plain text (emails are in mailto links)
  • Form validation on client side
  • Use of HTTPS resources for analytics and fonts

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
imedia.cz
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenges.
  2. Content is professionally presented in Czech language with multi-language options.
  3. Clear contact information and company details are provided.
  4. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with category-based opt-in.
  5. Use of modern web technologies and analytics tools.
  6. No visible security headers in HTML but HTTPS usage implied.
  7. No privacy or security incident contact information found.
  8. ISO certification displayed as trust indicator.
  9. No terms of service page detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a custom or unknown CMS with a technology stack including jQuery 3.3.1, Font Awesome, Lightbox, Google Analytics, and Google Tag Manager. It loads fonts from Google Fonts and uses cookie consent scripts from Osano. Hosting is likely provided by REG-ZONER based on nameservers. The site is mobile-optimized with responsive design and clear navigation. Performance is moderate, with no explicit speed metrics but no obvious bottlenecks. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and language attributes. Accessibility is basic but present. The site lacks modern frameworks like React or Angular, indicating a traditional web architecture. Technical debt appears low but could benefit from modernization and security header implementation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feroplast.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feroplast.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.