Skip to main content

Security report for ferobet.cz

FEROBET s.r.o. · Manufacturing · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FEROBET s.r.o. is a Czech manufacturer specializing in quality concrete products including paving stones, curbs, walls, stairs, palisades, and garden architecture elements. The company targets general consumers and businesses in the construction and landscaping sectors within the Czech Republic. The website presents a professional and consistent brand image with clear descriptions of their product offerings, positioning them as a local manufacturer with a focused product line. Technically, the website is built using the Framer platform and utilizes Google Fonts for typography. The site is moderately optimized for performance and mobile devices, with basic SEO and accessibility features. However, there is no detected CMS or hosting provider information, and no advanced technical frameworks beyond Framer are evident. From a security perspective, the site lacks critical security headers and privacy-related policies such as privacy and cookie policies. No WHOIS data is available, which raises concerns about domain registration transparency. There are no visible analytics or tracking scripts, indicating minimal user tracking. The overall security posture is basic, with recommendations to implement HTTPS verification, security headers, and privacy compliance documentation. Overall, the website is functional and presents the business well but requires improvements in security, privacy compliance, and transparency to enhance trustworthiness and meet modern standards.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching ferobet.cz

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
40
Email security
70
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
10
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FEROBET s.r.o. operates in the manufacturing sector, focusing on concrete construction materials for landscaping and architectural applications. Their business model is primarily manufacturing and direct supply to construction and landscaping clients. The company appears to be a small local player in the Czech market with no visible parent or subsidiary companies. The website content suggests a focus on quality and design, targeting both commercial and residential customers interested in durable and aesthetic concrete products. There is no evidence of e-commerce or online sales, indicating a traditional sales approach. The absence of contact details and privacy policies may limit customer engagement and trust. No partnerships or certifications are displayed, which could be areas for strategic development.

Security posture

The website currently exhibits a low security maturity level. It lacks essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options, which are critical for protecting against common web vulnerabilities. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates non-compliance with GDPR and other data protection regulations. No incident response or security contact information is provided, which is a gap in readiness for security events. The lack of WHOIS data reduces transparency and trust in domain ownership. No vulnerable libraries or exposed sensitive data were detected, but the overall security posture is weak. The site uses HTTPS, but SSL configuration details are unknown. Recommendations include implementing comprehensive security headers, publishing privacy and cookie policies, and establishing clear incident response contacts.

Recommendations

  1. Verify and publish complete WHOIS domain registration information to improve transparency.
  2. Implement and enforce HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and regularly audit SSL certificates.
  3. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with clear GDPR compliance statements.
  4. Deploy essential security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  5. Provide clear contact information including emails and phone numbers for customer support and security incident reporting.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FEROBET s.r.o.
Description
Český výrobce kvalitního sortimentu z betonu. Dlažby. Obrubníky. Zdi, schody a palisády. Zahradní architektura. Technické prvky. Designové sestavy.
Key services
concrete paving, curbs, walls, stairs, palisades, garden architecture, technical elements, design sets
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Framer, Google Fonts
Frameworks
Framer
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
30/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is built using Framer platform with custom fonts from Google Fonts.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces transparency.
  3. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on the site.
  4. No contact emails, phone numbers, or social media links detected in the content.
  5. No security headers or advanced security configurations detected.
  6. No analytics or tracking scripts detected, indicating minimal user tracking.
  7. Content is focused on concrete manufacturing products and garden architecture.
  8. No adult or questionable content detected; site is safe for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Framer platform, leveraging its design and layout capabilities. It uses Google Fonts for typography, ensuring good font rendering. The site is moderately optimized for mobile devices and has a clean, professional design. However, there is no evidence of a traditional CMS or backend platform, which may limit scalability and content management flexibility. Performance is moderate, with no explicit indicators of advanced caching or CDN usage. Accessibility features are basic, and SEO optimization is minimal but present through meta tags and Open Graph data. The lack of analytics and tracking scripts suggests minimal data collection, which may be positive for privacy but limits marketing insights. Technical risks include missing security headers and unknown hosting provider details.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with ferobet.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review ferobet.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.