Skip to main content

Security report for fenetra.cz

Fenetra · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 11 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Email security and 3 other checks.

Security score

42/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Fenetra is a small craft brewery based in the Czech Republic, specializing in beers inspired by traditional and modern brewing techniques, particularly focusing on barrel-aged and spontaneously fermented beers. Their product portfolio is diverse, targeting craft beer enthusiasts who appreciate complex and rustic beer styles. The website reflects a well-branded and consistent digital presence with detailed product information and active social media engagement. Technically, the site uses modern frontend technologies including Bootstrap, jQuery, and Google services, hosted on Czech infrastructure. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and CSRF protections, but lacks explicit security headers and formal privacy or cookie policies. The absence of vulnerability disclosure and incident response information suggests room for improvement in security transparency. Overall, the domain registration and website content are consistent and legitimate, supporting a trustworthy business profile.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
10/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

11 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

  2. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fenetra.cz

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
72
Security headers
15
Email security
60
DNS health
75
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
10
Average
42

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Fenetra occupies a niche market in the craft beer industry, leveraging traditional fermentation methods and barrel aging to differentiate its products. Their business model includes direct online sales via a partner e-shop and distribution through various retail and hospitality venues in Czechia and Slovakia. The company demonstrates a strong brand identity and community engagement through social media. The domain age and registration details align with the business timeline, reinforcing credibility. Partnerships with local e-commerce and digital studios support their operational ecosystem. Growth potential lies in expanding market reach and enhancing digital compliance and security practices.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and includes CSRF tokens, indicating basic security hygiene. However, the lack of security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options reduces protection against common web attacks. No forms collecting sensitive data were detected, minimizing immediate risk exposure. The absence of a privacy policy and cookie consent mechanism is a compliance gap under GDPR. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which could hinder timely security issue reporting and resolution. Overall, the security posture is moderate but would benefit from enhanced transparency and technical controls.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement and configure security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Create and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident reporting.
  4. Add incident response contact information, such as a dedicated security or abuse email address.
  5. Enhance website accessibility features to improve compliance and user experience.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
VAT number
CZ28854039
Registration number
28854039
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Fenetra
Description
Fenetra produces beers inspired by old beer traditions and modern experimentation, focusing on beers matured in wooden barrels with wild and spontaneous fermentation methods. They operate in the Potštejn region and offer a diverse portfolio including farmhouse ales, spontaneous blends, and barrel-aged strong beers.
Key services
Production of specialty beers, Online sales via e-shop, Distribution to retail and hospitality venues
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Bootstrap CSS, Slick Carousel, Vanillabox, Google Fonts (Montserrat), Google Maps API, jQuery 2.2.0, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics
Frameworks
Laravel (indicated by csrfToken in JS)
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
75/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • CSRF token present in meta and JS
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for analytics

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. No privacy or cookie policy found on the website.
  2. No terms of service or security policy pages detected.
  3. Contact information includes company email and physical address with VAT and registration numbers.
  4. Social media presence on Facebook and Instagram is active and linked.
  5. Website uses modern frontend technologies and Google services for analytics.
  6. No forms detected that collect user data directly on the homepage.
  7. No explicit security headers detected in the HTML content.
  8. No vulnerability disclosure or security.txt file found.
  9. Website content is focused on craft beer products with detailed descriptions and imagery.
  10. No adult or explicit content detected, but alcohol content restricts audience to mature users.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a Laravel backend with a Bootstrap-based frontend, enhanced by jQuery and Slick Carousel for UI components. Google Fonts and Google Maps API are used for styling and location services. Analytics and tag management are handled via Google Analytics and Google Tag Manager. Hosting is provided by Wedos, a Czech hosting provider, consistent with the business location. Performance is moderate with asynchronous loading of scripts. The site is mobile optimized with responsive design. SEO is basic with meta tags present but minimal content in description and keywords meta tags. No CMS detected, suggesting a custom or framework-based implementation. Technical risks include missing security headers and lack of formal privacy and cookie management.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fenetra.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fenetra.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.