Skip to main content

Security report for femdomstory.org

Private by Design, LLC · Other · United States

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

46/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FemdomStory.org operates as a niche adult content toplist specializing in femdom-related websites. The site aggregates and ranks various adult femdom and fetish sites, providing affiliate referral links to these external domains. The business model is primarily affiliate marketing within the adult entertainment sector, targeting an adults-only audience interested in femdom and BDSM content. The domain is long-established since 2001 and uses privacy protection typical for adult sites, registered via Private by Design, LLC in the US. Technically, the website uses basic HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with some custom scripts for click tracking and user interaction. The site lacks modern security headers and explicit HTTPS enforcement visible in the HTML content, indicating room for improvement in security posture. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic but functional. SEO is minimal but present with meta description and keywords. Security-wise, the site shows limited implementation of best practices. There are no privacy or cookie policies, no visible security headers, and no direct contact information for security or business inquiries. The domain status flags provide some protection against unauthorized changes. The site does have an abuse page, but no explicit security contact emails are provided. Overall, the security posture is weak and could expose the site to risks. The overall risk assessment suggests the site is functional but lacks critical compliance and security features expected for professional adult content platforms. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS with HSTS, adding privacy and cookie policies, improving security headers, and providing clear contact information to enhance trust and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching femdomstory.org

This scan found 27 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
0
GDPR outside view
50
Average
46

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FemdomStory.org occupies a niche market within adult entertainment, focusing on femdom and related fetishes. Its competitive advantage lies in its long domain age and curated toplist of femdom sites, attracting a targeted adult audience. The business model relies on affiliate marketing revenue streams by directing traffic to partner adult sites. The site maintains partnerships with multiple related adult domains, forming a network that supports cross-promotion. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal content and lack of modern marketing tools. The absence of direct contact information and privacy policies may hinder trust and expansion opportunities. The company operates under Private by Design, LLC, a privacy service provider, which is common in this sector to protect registrant identity.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of FemdomStory.org is low. The absence of HTTPS enforcement and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection exposes the site to common web vulnerabilities. No privacy or cookie policies are present, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response readiness is minimal, with only an abuse page but no explicit security contact channels. Data protection practices are unclear, and no vulnerability disclosure or security.txt files are found. The site uses JavaScript for tracking user screen data but lacks transparency on data retention. Overall, the security culture appears immature, requiring significant improvements to meet industry standards.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with HSTS to secure all site traffic and protect user data.
  2. Add comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and inform users.
  3. Deploy security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-XSS-Protection.
  4. Provide clear contact information including security and business inquiry emails.
  5. Develop a vulnerability disclosure policy and publish a security.txt file to enhance transparency and trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Private by Design, LLC
Description
The ranking list of femdom sites.
Key services
Ranking and listing femdom adult websites, Affiliate referrals to adult content sites
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, XMLHttpRequest, URLSearchParams
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status includes clientDeleteProhibited and clientTransferProhibited to prevent unauthorized changes

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Ad networks
alt.com
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content toplist focused on femdom niche.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found on main page.
  3. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found.
  4. Incident response contact page exists (/abuse.html) but no explicit emails listed.
  5. Site uses affiliate marketing with many external adult domains linked.
  6. No modern security headers or HTTPS enforcement visible in HTML content.
  7. Basic mobile and accessibility support present.
  8. No social media or company contact info found.
  9. Domain is old and registered via privacy service, typical for adult sites.
  10. No WAF or blocking detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built with standard HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript without use of major CMS or frameworks. The tech stack is simple but functional for a toplist directory. Performance is moderate with lazy loading of images and deferred JavaScript. Mobile optimization is basic with responsive CSS variables but could be improved for better user experience. SEO is minimal but includes meta description and keywords. The site uses custom JavaScript for click tracking and navigation manipulation. Hosting details are limited but DNS is managed via ns1.spears.top and ns2.spears.top. No CDN or advanced performance optimization detected. Technical risks include lack of HTTPS enforcement and missing security headers which could impact user trust and search rankings.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with femdomstory.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review femdomstory.org.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.