Skip to main content

Security report for femdomfootfetish.com

SmuttyCash · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 7 critical or high findings in Email security, SSL/TLS and 2 other checks.

Security score

53/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FemdomFootFetish.com is an adult entertainment website specializing in femdom foot fetish pay-per-view videos. The site operates a subscription and pay-per-view business model targeting adult consumers interested in niche fetish content. The platform offers video streaming, live cams, and user account management, positioning itself as a niche player within the adult content market. The domain has been registered since 2007, indicating a stable presence in this segment. Technically, the website uses legacy JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 1.9.1 and jQuery UI 1.10.2, with some scripts loaded over HTTP, which introduces security risks. Hosting appears to leverage Amazon AWS DNS infrastructure. The site lacks modern SEO and accessibility optimizations and does not implement cookie consent mechanisms despite using Google Analytics for tracking. From a security perspective, the site does not present advanced security headers or DNSSEC, and the use of outdated libraries and mixed content reduces its security posture. The WHOIS data is consistent with the website's age and business type, enhancing trustworthiness. However, privacy compliance is minimal, with no visible GDPR indicators or cookie consent banners. Overall, the website functions adequately for its niche but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to reduce risks and enhance user trust.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

7 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

  3. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching femdomfootfetish.com

This scan found 21 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
53

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The business operates in a niche adult entertainment market focusing on femdom foot fetish content, leveraging a pay-per-view and subscription revenue model. Its competitive advantage lies in specialized content catering to a specific fetish audience. The partnership ecosystem includes established payment processors (CCBill, Epoch, SegPay) and customer service providers, indicating a structured operational approach. Growth indicators are limited from the data, but the domain longevity suggests sustained operations. The business model relies heavily on digital content delivery and user membership management, with potential for expansion through improved technical infrastructure and marketing. Strategically, the company should focus on enhancing privacy compliance and security to maintain customer trust and meet regulatory requirements. The lack of visible social media presence or broader marketing tools suggests opportunities for growth through digital marketing and brand building.

Security posture

The current security maturity level is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the use of outdated JavaScript libraries, mixed content loading, absence of security headers, and lack of DNSSEC. These issues expose the site to potential cross-site scripting (XSS), man-in-the-middle attacks, and other common web vulnerabilities. The absence of cookie consent mechanisms and minimal privacy policy details indicate compliance gaps with GDPR and other privacy regulations. Incident response and security policy documentation are not found, suggesting limited preparedness for security incidents. The business impact of these vulnerabilities includes potential data breaches, loss of customer trust, and regulatory penalties. Immediate remediation should focus on upgrading libraries, enforcing HTTPS for all resources, implementing security headers, and establishing privacy compliance mechanisms. Enhancing incident response readiness and documenting security policies will further strengthen the security culture.

Recommendations

  1. Upgrade all JavaScript libraries to current secure versions and ensure all external scripts load over HTTPS.
  2. Implement comprehensive cookie consent and privacy compliance mechanisms aligned with GDPR requirements.
  3. Deploy security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  4. Enable DNSSEC for the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  5. Develop and publish clear security policies and incident response procedures to improve security posture and customer trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
SmuttyCash
Description
Adult entertainment website specializing in femdom foot fetish pay-per-view videos featuring various models.
Key services
Adult video streaming, Membership access, Live cams, User account management
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
jQuery 1.9.1, jQuery UI 1.10.2, Google Analytics, SWFUpload, Custom JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
poor

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
good
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is an adult content pay-per-view platform focused on femdom foot fetish niche.
  2. Content is accessible and not blocked by WAF or security challenges.
  3. Use of outdated JavaScript libraries and mixed HTTP/HTTPS resources present security risks.
  4. No visible privacy or cookie consent mechanisms despite use of tracking scripts.
  5. WHOIS data shows a long-standing domain with no privacy protection, enhancing trust.
  6. Contact information is limited but includes a support email and contact page link.
  7. No structured data (JSON-LD) or Open Graph metadata found.
  8. SEO and accessibility optimizations are minimal.
  9. Security headers and advanced security policies are not detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website's technical infrastructure is based on legacy JavaScript libraries and custom scripts, with partial reliance on third-party services like Google Analytics and AWS DNS. The site lacks a modern CMS or framework, which may contribute to technical debt and maintenance challenges. Performance is moderate but could be improved by optimizing resource loading and updating technology stack. Mobile optimization and accessibility are basic, limiting user experience on diverse devices. SEO is minimal, with empty meta keywords and description tags, reducing discoverability. Modernization opportunities include adopting responsive design frameworks, improving SEO metadata, and integrating accessibility standards to enhance overall technical quality and business operations.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with femdomfootfetish.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review femdomfootfetish.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.