Skip to main content

Security report for feiranarosenbaum.com.br

Feira na Rosenbaum · Other · Brazil

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in Network security, Security headers and 1 other check.

Security score

49/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feira na Rosenbaum is a Brazilian cultural and design event platform that showcases independent Brazilian artists and designers through fairs and an online presence. The website serves as a portal to promote the event, artists, and related news, targeting audiences interested in Brazilian design and culture. The business operates in a niche market with a small size and focuses on promoting Brazilian identity through design. Technically, the website is built on an outdated WordPress CMS version 4.8.25, hosted on solisys.net.br, and uses common web technologies such as Google Analytics and Font Awesome. Performance is slow with a high load time, but mobile optimization and SEO are reasonably good. Security posture is weak, with no valid SSL certificate, no modern TLS protocols, and no security headers or DNS security features implemented. There is a lack of privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies, which impacts compliance and trust. Overall, the site is functional for its business purpose but requires significant security and compliance improvements.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Network security

    Services reachable from the internet are the first thing attackers probe. Anything open that does not need to be should be closed.

    • Critical

      Critical Service Exposed: MySQL

      Port 3306 (MySQL) is publicly accessible - MySQL - Database server

      What to do: Immediately restrict access to MySQL using firewall or VPN

      • NIS2 21(2)(e)
      • IR 2024/2690 6.7.2(f): Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690, Annex point 6.7.2(f): Network security
      • NIST CM-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 CM-7: Least Functionality
      • NIST SC-7: NIST SP 800-53 Rev. 5 SC-7: Boundary Protection

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feiranarosenbaum.com.br

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
90
Security headers
15
Email security
50
DNS health
85
Network security
60
GDPR outside view
25
Average
54
After the cap
49

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet · found on this site
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company positions itself as a cultural promoter and marketplace for Brazilian design, leveraging events and an online store to reach its audience. Its competitive advantage lies in its focus on Brazilian identity and plural artistic expressions. Revenue streams likely include event participation fees, sales commissions from the online store, and possibly sponsorships. The target customers are culturally engaged consumers and design enthusiasts in Brazil. The partnership ecosystem includes a related online store domain. Growth indicators are limited from the data, but the presence of social media and newsletter subscription suggests ongoing audience engagement. Strategic observations include the need to modernize the technical infrastructure and improve compliance to enhance market trust and scalability.

Security posture

The current security maturity is low. The absence of a valid SSL certificate and modern TLS protocols exposes users to data interception risks. Missing security headers and DNS security features increase vulnerability to common web attacks. No privacy or cookie policies are published, indicating compliance gaps with GDPR and similar regulations. Incident response readiness is not evident, with no security contact channels provided. The use of an outdated WordPress version may expose the site to known vulnerabilities. Overall, the security posture poses business risks including reputational damage and potential data breaches.

Recommendations

  1. Obtain and deploy a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all website traffic with HTTPS.
  2. Update WordPress CMS and all plugins/themes to the latest versions to mitigate known vulnerabilities.
  3. Publish comprehensive privacy, cookie, and terms of service policies to improve legal compliance and user trust.
  4. Implement security headers (CSP, X-Frame-Options, etc.) and enable DNSSEC and CAA records to strengthen security.
  5. Establish incident response contact channels and consider appointing a Data Protection Officer to enhance security culture.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Technical notes

Notes

The website infrastructure relies on an outdated WordPress CMS version 4.8.25, which may contain unpatched security vulnerabilities. Hosting is provided by solisys.net.br, with DNS records lacking DNSSEC and CAA configurations. The site uses Google Analytics for tracking and Font Awesome for icons, with Bootstrap implied for UI components. Performance is poor with a load time exceeding 17 seconds, indicating potential optimization needs. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility is only basic. SEO is adequately addressed with metadata and structured data (JSON-LD) for organization and website. Technical debt is present due to outdated software and missing security best practices, posing risks to business continuity and user trust.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feiranarosenbaum.com.br. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feiranarosenbaum.com.br.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.