Skip to main content

Security report for feedvisor.com

Feedvisor · E-commerce · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers and SSL/TLS.

Security score

68/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feedvisor is a well-established AI-first SaaS company founded in 2010, specializing in marketplace optimization solutions primarily for Amazon, Walmart, and other e-commerce platforms. Their offerings include dynamic pricing, advertising optimization, and integrated solutions designed to help large sellers, brands, and agencies maximize marketplace performance. The company positions itself as a leader in AI-powered e-commerce tools with a strong focus on data-driven decision making and expert support. Technically, the website is built on WordPress with modern plugins and integrations such as Elementor, Yoast SEO, Google Tag Manager, and Cookiebot, reflecting a mature digital infrastructure. The site is hosted on AWS infrastructure, ensuring reliable performance and scalability. Security posture is good with HTTPS enforced and consent management implemented, but lacks some advanced security headers and explicit security policies. Privacy compliance is partial, with cookie consent but no visible privacy or terms of service pages in the provided content. Overall, the website is professional, trustworthy, and well-optimized for SEO and user experience, targeting enterprise and large sellers in the e-commerce sector.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
83/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedvisor.com

This scan found 24 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
47
Security headers
25
Email security
70
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
83
Average
68

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feedvisor.com, from OffSeq Breach.

Total records
165
Employees
7
Customers
113
Third parties
45
Weak passwords
42%

Latest record dated 2025-07-20 · 9 subdomains affected

See the 10 newest leaked credentials

A one-off add-on to this report that lists the most recent identifier and password pairs OffSeq Breach holds for feedvisor.com.

Select it in the checkout above.

Masked preview

  • –dashboard.feedvisor.com2025-07-20
  • –new-demo.feedvisor.com2025-07-20
  • –admin.feedvisor.com2025-07-20
  • –dashboard-qa.feedvisor.com2025-07-20
  • –dashboard-staging.feedvisor.com2025-07-20

Breach keeps ingesting new leaks, so these numbers can grow between scans.

Open in Breach(opens in a new tab)Monitor on Breach(opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Feedvisor operates in the competitive e-commerce SaaS market, focusing on AI-driven pricing and advertising optimization. Their business model revolves around subscription-based software solutions complemented by expert consulting services. The company targets large sellers, private labels, brands, and agencies selling on Amazon, Walmart, Shopify, and other marketplaces. Their integrated platform and award-winning technology provide a competitive advantage by combining pricing and advertising intelligence. The presence of multiple lead capture forms and marketing automation tools indicates a strong focus on customer acquisition and nurturing. Social media presence across major platforms and customer testimonials enhance brand credibility. The domain age and WHOIS data support the legitimacy and maturity of the business. No suspicious or privacy-protected WHOIS data was found, reinforcing trustworthiness.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses reputable third-party services for analytics, marketing, and consent management, which is positive for security and privacy. However, the absence of DNSSEC and security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options represents areas for improvement. No explicit security policies or incident response contacts are published, which could hinder transparency and trust in case of security incidents. The forms collect personal and business data securely via HTTPS, but no visible CAPTCHA or advanced bot protection is noted beyond Cookiebot consent. Overall, the security posture is good but could be enhanced by implementing additional HTTP security headers, publishing security policies, and enabling DNSSEC.

Recommendations

  1. Enable DNSSEC on the domain to improve DNS security and prevent spoofing.
  2. Implement and configure HTTP security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and X-Frame-Options.
  3. Publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service pages accessible from the website footer.
  4. Add a security policy and incident response contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and libraries to ensure no vulnerable versions are used.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Feedvisor
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feedvisor
Description
The “AI-first” platform and expert team transforming e-marketplace performance on Amazon, Walmart and beyond for large sellers & brands
Key services
360 Pricing Optimization, 360 Advertising, 360 Integrated Solution, Essentials Price Optimization, Brand Services, Walmart Ads and Marketplace Service
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO Premium, Elementor, jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Cookiebot, Hotjar, Marketo Forms, Tapfiliate, PartnerStack, Slider Revolution, Flatpickr, Select2
Frameworks
WordPress, Elementor
Platforms
Amazon, Walmart, Shopify, eBay, Bigcommerce
Performance
moderate
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
excellent

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enabled
  • Use of Cookiebot for consent management
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of Google Tag Manager for controlled script loading

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics (via GTM), Hotjar
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads (via Google Tag Manager), Tapfiliate
Tracking pixels
Hotjar, Cookiebot
Marketing tools
Marketo Forms, AddThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is professionally designed with clear branding and consistent messaging.
  2. Strong focus on AI-powered e-commerce optimization solutions for Amazon and other marketplaces.
  3. Multiple forms collect detailed business and contact information, indicating lead generation focus.
  4. Use of modern marketing and analytics tools integrated via Google Tag Manager.
  5. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found in the provided content.
  6. Cookie consent is managed via Cookiebot, indicating GDPR awareness.
  7. No visible security policy or incident response contacts.
  8. WHOIS data shows domain is well-established and not privacy protected.
  9. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected; content fully accessible.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses a modern WordPress CMS with Elementor page builder and Yoast SEO for content management and optimization. It integrates multiple marketing and analytics tools including Google Tag Manager, Hotjar, Cookiebot, Marketo Forms, Tapfiliate, and PartnerStack, indicating a mature marketing automation setup. Hosting is inferred to be on AWS based on DNS servers. The site is mobile-optimized and uses responsive design techniques. Performance is moderate, likely influenced by multiple third-party scripts. The site lacks DNSSEC and some security headers, which are technical risks. The use of structured data (JSON-LD) and Open Graph tags is well implemented for SEO and social sharing. Overall, the technical infrastructure is robust but could benefit from security hardening and performance optimization.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedvisor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedvisor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.