Skip to main content

Security report for feedr.co.uk

GoDaddy Operating Company, LLC · E-commerce · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers and GDPR outside view.

Security score

81/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The website is a domain sales landing page hosted by GoDaddy, offering the domain feedr.co.uk for sale. It leverages GoDaddy's trusted brand and domain brokerage services to facilitate secure and straightforward domain acquisitions. The platform targets businesses and individuals seeking premium domain names, providing options such as buy now and lease to own. The site integrates partner services like Afternic and Trustpilot to enhance trust and customer confidence. Technically, the site is built using modern web technologies including React and Next.js, hosted on GoDaddy's infrastructure. It demonstrates good performance, mobile optimization, and basic accessibility features. The presence of secure HTTPS and secure payment messaging indicates a mature digital infrastructure, although explicit security headers are not detected. From a security perspective, the site shows a strong posture with HTTPS enforcement and no visible vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data. However, it lacks explicit security policies and incident response information, which could be improved to enhance compliance and user trust. Privacy and cookie policies are present but basic, with GDPR compliance implied but not explicitly detailed. Overall, the site is legitimate and trustworthy, operated by a well-known domain registrar. The lack of WHOIS data for the subdomain is expected and does not detract from legitimacy. Strategic recommendations include enhancing security headers, expanding privacy and security policy disclosures, and improving accessibility and SEO metadata to further strengthen the platform's professionalism and compliance.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedr.co.uk

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
65
Email security
87
DNS health
85
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
81

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Breach exposure

Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.

Dark web exposure

Add-on

Leaked records that mention feedr.co.uk, from OffSeq Breach.

No leaked records found

Breach holds no records for feedr.co.uk right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.

Monitor on Breach (opens in a new tab)

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

GoDaddy operates this domain sales platform as part of its extensive domain aftermarket business. The company holds a leading market position with over 80 million domains under management globally. The business model focuses on domain sales, brokerage, and secure transfers, targeting entrepreneurs, startups, and established businesses seeking premium domain assets. Revenue streams include direct domain sales, leasing options, and brokerage commissions. The partnership ecosystem includes Afternic for domain listings and Trustpilot for customer reviews, enhancing market credibility. The platform's operations reflect a mature, enterprise-level infrastructure with a focus on user trust and streamlined purchasing experiences.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a solid security posture with mandatory HTTPS and secure payment processing. No critical vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options represents a gap in best practices. The site lacks publicly available incident response or vulnerability disclosure policies, which are important for compliance with regulations like GDPR and NIS2. Data protection practices appear basic but adequate for the business type. Overall, the security maturity is good but could benefit from enhanced policy transparency and technical hardening.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive security headers including CSP, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options to mitigate common web attacks.
  2. Publish detailed privacy, security, and incident response policies accessible from the landing page to improve compliance and user trust.
  3. Enhance accessibility features to meet WCAG standards, improving usability for all users.
  4. Expand SEO metadata with Open Graph and JSON-LD structured data to improve search engine visibility and social sharing.
  5. Establish a vulnerability disclosure program or security.txt file to encourage responsible reporting and improve security posture.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
GoDaddy Operating Company, LLC
Description
Domain marketplace landing page offering the domain feedr.co.uk for sale with options to buy now or lease to own, supported by GoDaddy's domain brokerage services.
Key services
Domain sales, Domain brokerage, Secure domain transfer, Customer support
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
React (Next.js), JavaScript, CSS, Web fonts (GDSherpa), GoDaddy proprietary APIs
Frameworks
Next.js
Platforms
GoDaddy hosting
Performance
fast
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure payment processing
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Google Analytics (implied by gas array), Trustpilot widget
Marketing tools
GoDaddy marketing and tracking scripts
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a domain sales landing page hosted by GoDaddy
  2. No WHOIS record for the subdomain, expected behavior
  3. Clear call to action to buy domain feedr.co.uk
  4. Good branding and trust signals from GoDaddy and Trustpilot
  5. No signs of malicious or adult content
  6. Uses modern web technologies and good performance
  7. Limited explicit privacy or security policy pages visible but implied
  8. No contact emails found, only phone number and contact form
  9. No security headers detected in HTML source
  10. No suspicious external domains or links
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern React-based framework (Next.js) with server-side rendering capabilities, ensuring fast load times and good performance. The use of web fonts and optimized CSS contributes to a polished user experience. Hosting is provided by GoDaddy, a reputable provider with robust infrastructure. The technical implementation is clean with no broken elements detected. However, the site could improve by adding more comprehensive accessibility features and SEO optimizations. The lack of explicit security headers is a technical risk that should be addressed to prevent potential exploitation.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedr.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedr.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.