Skip to main content

Security report for feedimageeditor.com

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. · E-commerce · Czech Republic

Medium risk. 4 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

75/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o. operates a specialized SaaS platform focused on bulk editing and enhancement of product images for e-commerce stores. Their service improves product image quality through features like background removal, watermark removal, and image upscaling, targeting online retailers seeking to increase sales and ad performance. The company positions itself as a niche player with a subscription-based business model and partnerships with platforms like Mergado Store. Technically, the website is built on Drupal 7 with modern integrations such as Google Analytics, CookieHub for consent management, and Cloudflare for security and performance. The site is well-structured, mobile-optimized, and includes multiple trust signals such as industry badges and social media presence. Security posture is solid with HTTPS and bot management, though some security headers and policies could be improved. The absence of WHOIS data for the domain is a notable anomaly that slightly reduces trust but does not negate the professional presentation and business legitimacy evident on the site. Overall, the company demonstrates a mature digital presence with room for enhanced transparency and security documentation.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
80/ 100 · Low
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  3. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • High

      No DMARC record found

      DMARC provides email authentication and reporting

      What to do: Add DMARC record: "v=DMARC1; p=none; rua=mailto:dmarc@yourdomain.com"

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedimageeditor.com

This scan found 19 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
60
Email security
65
DNS health
80
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
80
Average
75

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets e-commerce businesses needing efficient image processing solutions to boost product attractiveness and ad effectiveness. Their competitive advantage lies in automation and bulk processing capabilities tailored to meet ad platform requirements. Revenue is generated via a fixed monthly subscription independent of image volume, appealing to scaling online stores. Partnerships with Mergado Store and industry associations like APEK enhance market credibility. The business model is SaaS with a focus on marketing and advertising channels. Growth indicators include active blog content, workshops, and integration with popular ad systems. The company operates in the Czech Republic with a small team under the Profitak group umbrella. Strategic observations suggest potential for expansion into broader digital marketing tools and enhanced compliance documentation to build further trust.

Security posture

The website employs HTTPS with Cloudflare protection and bot management, indicating a baseline strong security posture. Cookie consent is implemented with granular categories, reflecting GDPR awareness. However, the lack of explicit security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and absence of publicly available security policies or incident response plans highlight areas for improvement. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analysis. The missing WHOIS data for the domain is a concern for domain legitimacy and could pose risks if the domain registration is not properly maintained. Overall, the security maturity is moderate to good but would benefit from enhanced transparency and formalized security documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and terms of service on the website.
  2. Add standard security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options.
  3. Establish and publish a security.txt file to facilitate vulnerability disclosure and incident response.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure transparency and trust.
  5. Enhance accessibility compliance to improve user experience for all visitors.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Registration number
07139365
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feed Image Editor technologies, s.r.o.
Description
Feed Image Editor is an application for improving quality of product pictures in your online store. It offers features such as background & watermark removal, image upscale, graphic templates, campaign scheduling, and export to various ad systems. No special skills needed.
Key services
Bulk image editing, Background removal, Watermark removal, Image upscaling, Graphic template creation, Campaign scheduling, Export to ad systems
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Drupal 7, jQuery 2.2, Bootstrap, Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, CookieHub CMP, Calendly widget, Cloudflare
Frameworks
Drupal
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular categories
  • Use of Cloudflare Bot Management cookies

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, Plausible Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google Ads, DoubleClick
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Ads, YouTube
Marketing tools
Calendly
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with no blocking or WAF challenge
  2. Professional e-commerce SaaS offering with clear business focus
  3. Good use of modern web technologies and analytics
  4. Cookie consent and privacy mechanisms implemented
  5. WHOIS data missing or unavailable, which is unusual
  6. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service found on main site
  7. Contact information is present and credible
  8. No security.txt or incident response info publicly available
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on Drupal 7 CMS, leveraging jQuery and Bootstrap for frontend responsiveness and interactivity. Integration with Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager, and Plausible Analytics provides comprehensive traffic and user behavior insights. CookieHub manages cookie consent with detailed categorization, supporting GDPR compliance. Hosting and security are managed via Cloudflare, providing bot management and performance optimization. The site loads multiple CSS and JS assets efficiently and includes mobile optimization. Technical debt may exist due to Drupal 7's aging platform status, suggesting future modernization. No critical technical vulnerabilities were identified, but security header enhancements and updated CMS versions are recommended to mitigate risks.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedimageeditor.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedimageeditor.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.