Skip to main content

Security report for feedburner.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

82/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is the Google Accounts sign-in page, a critical entry point for accessing various Google services including Feedburner. It is operated by Google LLC, a leading global technology company and subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. The site serves a broad general audience requiring secure authentication to Google platforms. The business model centers on providing robust user authentication and account management services as part of Google's extensive ecosystem. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, HTML5, and CSS3, hosted on Google Cloud Platform infrastructure. It demonstrates excellent performance, mobile optimization, and accessibility features. The use of proprietary Google frameworks and APIs ensures a seamless user experience and integration with other Google services. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and implements comprehensive security headers such as Content Security Policy and Strict-Transport-Security. The login forms are secured against common vulnerabilities, and no exposed sensitive data or outdated libraries were detected. The domain's WHOIS data is privacy protected or restricted, which is typical for large enterprises like Google, and does not detract from the domain's legitimacy. Overall, the site exhibits a high level of security maturity, technical sophistication, and business credibility. There are no indications of malicious activity or content safety concerns. Privacy compliance indicators are moderate due to the absence of visible privacy or cookie policy links on this specific login page, though Google’s broader policies are well established. Strategic recommendations include maintaining rigorous security audits, enhancing visible privacy compliance disclosures on entry pages, and continuing to monitor for emerging threats to sustain trust and security posture.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of feedburner.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedburner.com

This scan found 13 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
82

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC holds a dominant position in the global technology sector, offering a wide range of internet services including search, advertising, cloud computing, and user authentication. The sign-in page analyzed is a fundamental component of Google's service delivery, enabling secure access to its ecosystem. The business model leverages user data and service integration to drive advertising revenue and platform engagement. Target customers include individual users, enterprises, and developers worldwide. Google’s extensive partnership ecosystem and parent company Alphabet Inc. provide strategic advantages in innovation and market reach. The company’s operations reflect a mature, enterprise-scale digital infrastructure with continuous growth and innovation focus.

Security posture

The security posture of the Google Accounts sign-in page is robust, featuring enforced HTTPS, advanced security headers, and secure form handling. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive information were identified. The domain’s privacy-protected WHOIS data is standard for large enterprises and does not raise concerns. Compliance with GDPR and other regulations is implied by Google's global policies, though not explicitly visible on this page. Incident response and security policy details are not directly accessible here but are managed at the corporate level. The site demonstrates a strong security culture and readiness to handle threats, minimizing risk to users and business operations.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance visibility of privacy and cookie policies on login pages to improve user trust and compliance transparency.
  2. Continue regular security audits and penetration testing to identify and mitigate emerging vulnerabilities.
  3. Implement explicit GDPR compliance indicators on all user-facing pages.
  4. Maintain and update security headers and SSL/TLS configurations to adhere to best practices.
  5. Promote user education on secure authentication practices and phishing awareness.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google Accounts sign-in page for accessing Google services such as Feedburner.
Key services
User authentication, Account management, Access to Google services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, HTML5, CSS3, Google APIs
Frameworks
Google proprietary frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • Input validation on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Domain WHOIS data is not publicly available due to privacy or registry restrictions.
  2. Website is a Google sign-in page with secure HTTPS and modern web technologies.
  3. No contact emails or phone numbers are exposed on the sign-in page.
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service links are directly visible on this page.
  5. No suspicious or malicious content detected.
  6. No WAF or security challenge blocking access detected.
  7. Page is optimized for mobile and accessibility.
  8. Strong security headers and best practices implemented.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on a modern, scalable infrastructure leveraging Google Cloud Platform and proprietary Google frameworks. It uses optimized JavaScript and CSS for fast loading and responsive design. Accessibility features are well implemented, supporting diverse user needs. The technical stack is mature with minimal technical debt, ensuring reliability and performance. Opportunities exist to further enhance SEO and privacy disclosures. The site’s architecture supports high traffic volumes and integrates seamlessly with other Google services, reflecting a high level of technical maturity and operational excellence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100 −1Low25 findingsView report
  2. 78/100 +12Low25 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium24 findingsView report
  4. 66/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedburner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedburner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.