Skip to main content

Security report for feedburner.com

Google LLC · Technology · United States

Low risk. 4 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

78/100

Risk levelLow

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

The analyzed website is the Google Accounts sign-in page, specifically for accessing the Feedburner service. It serves as a secure authentication portal for users to log into their Google accounts. As a subdomain of google.com, it benefits from the strong brand recognition and trust associated with Google LLC, a leading technology company headquartered in the United States and a subsidiary of Alphabet Inc. The page is designed with a professional and consistent branding approach, targeting a general audience of internet users who require access to Google services. From a technical perspective, the site employs modern web technologies including JavaScript, JSON-LD structured data, and Google APIs. It is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, ensuring high performance, fast loading times, and excellent mobile optimization. The site includes robust security headers and enforces HTTPS, reflecting a mature security posture. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the analyzed content. Security-wise, the page demonstrates best practices such as secure cookie handling, content security policies, and input validation on forms. There are no indications of phishing or malware. However, the page lacks visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service links, which slightly reduces privacy compliance scoring. Overall, the domain and page are highly trustworthy and secure. The overall risk assessment is low given the site's association with Google and its adherence to security standards. Strategic recommendations include maintaining up-to-date security headers, conducting regular security audits, and enhancing visible privacy and cookie policy disclosures to improve user trust and compliance. The technical infrastructure is robust, but continuous monitoring and modernization should be pursued to sustain performance and security.

Scanned

This is an earlier scan of feedburner.com. View the latest report

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
53/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

4 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feedburner.com

This scan found 16 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. See sample alerts.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
52
Security headers
90
Email security
83
DNS health
90
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
53
Average
78

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

Google LLC operates as a global leader in technology, providing a wide range of internet services including search, advertising, cloud computing, and identity management. The analyzed page is part of Google's authentication infrastructure, critical for user access control across its ecosystem. Google's market position is dominant, with a business model centered on advertising revenue, cloud services, and platform monetization. The target customer segments include individual users, enterprises, and developers worldwide. The company has a vast partnership ecosystem and a strong brand presence. Growth indicators remain positive with continuous innovation and expansion into new technology sectors. The authentication service is essential for securing user data and enabling seamless access to Google's services.

Security posture

The security maturity of the Google Accounts sign-in page is high. The site enforces HTTPS with strong SSL/TLS configurations and implements multiple security headers such as Strict-Transport-Security, Content-Security-Policy, and X-Frame-Options. Input fields are secured against common web vulnerabilities. No exposed credentials or sensitive data leaks were found. Compliance with GDPR and other privacy regulations is implied by Google's global policies, though explicit links on this page are absent. Incident response mechanisms and security policies are not directly visible but are expected given Google's security standards. The site shows a strong security culture and readiness to handle threats. No critical vulnerabilities or compliance gaps were detected in the analyzed content.

Recommendations

  1. Enhance visibility and accessibility of privacy and cookie policies on the sign-in page to improve user awareness and compliance.
  2. Maintain and regularly update security headers and SSL/TLS configurations to protect against emerging threats.
  3. Implement explicit user consent mechanisms for cookies and tracking to align with GDPR and other privacy regulations.
  4. Conduct periodic security audits and penetration testing to identify and remediate potential vulnerabilities.
  5. Increase transparency around incident response and data protection officer contact information to build user trust.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Google LLC
Description
Google accounts sign-in page for accessing Google services including Feedburner.
Key services
User authentication, Account management, Access to Google services
Content quality
excellent
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
JavaScript, Google APIs, JSON-LD, HTML5, CSS3
Frameworks
Google internal frameworks
Platforms
Web
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
excellent
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
95/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure cookies
  • Content Security Policy
  • Input validation on forms

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
excellent
User experience
excellent
Content relevance
excellent
Navigation
excellent
Professionalism
excellent
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a Google account sign-in page for accessing Feedburner service
  2. No WHOIS data for subdomain as expected
  3. Uses HTTPS with strong security headers
  4. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service links directly on this page
  5. No contact information or business addresses on this page
  6. No signs of phishing or malicious content
  7. Content is professional, secure, and consistent with Google branding
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using modern web technologies including JavaScript, JSON-LD for structured data, and Google proprietary frameworks. It is hosted on Google Cloud Platform, ensuring scalability and reliability. The page loads quickly and is optimized for mobile devices with responsive design. Accessibility features are well implemented, supporting a broad user base. SEO practices are good with proper meta tags and language settings. There is no use of third-party CMS detected, indicating a custom-built platform. The technical infrastructure is robust with minimal technical debt. Opportunities exist to improve privacy disclosures and consent mechanisms. Overall, the technical implementation supports a secure, performant, and user-friendly authentication experience.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Earlier scans of this domain

  1. 77/100 −5Low25 findingsView report
  2. 82/100 +16Low22 findingsView report
  3. 66/100Medium24 findingsView report
  4. 66/100Medium24 findingsView report
Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feedburner.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feedburner.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.