Federal Reserve History · Government · United States
Low risk. 3 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.
FederalReserveHistory.org is an authoritative educational website dedicated to providing comprehensive historical information about the Federal Reserve System. It offers essays, timelines, and biographies aimed at researchers, students, and the general public interested in the Federal Reserve's history and policy. The site positions itself as a trusted resource with consistent branding and professional content, serving a medium-sized audience primarily in the United States government and finance sectors. Technically, the website employs modern frameworks such as Bootstrap 5 and integrates Google Analytics and Tag Manager for tracking. The site is mobile-optimized and has good SEO practices, though accessibility could be improved. From a security perspective, the site enforces HTTPS and uses secure form inputs but lacks some security headers and explicit security policies or incident response information. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected. Privacy compliance is partial, with a clear privacy policy but no cookie consent mechanism. WHOIS data is unavailable due to a malformed request, but the domain appears legitimate based on content and update timestamps. Overall, the website demonstrates a strong security posture with room for improvement in privacy and security transparency. The risk assessment indicates a low risk for users, with no adult or questionable content present. Strategic recommendations include implementing cookie consent, adding security headers, publishing security policies, and enhancing accessibility. These improvements would further strengthen trust and compliance while maintaining the site's authoritative position in Federal Reserve historical education.
Scanned
NIS2 Art. 21(2)
This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.
GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.
3 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.
These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.
GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage
What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes
GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies
What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit
TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.
SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak
What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key
Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com
This scan found 15 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.
€25per month
Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.
Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.
€39.90one-time
Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.
Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.
The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.
Counted in this score
Not counted
Findings that cap the score at 49
Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.
Partial scans
When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.
Risk levels
Leaked credentials and lookalike domains from OffSeq Breach. The counts are free; the detailed lists are paid add-ons.
Leaked records that mention federalreservehistory.org, from OffSeq Breach.
No leaked records found
Breach holds no records for federalreservehistory.org right now. New leaks arrive continuously, so monitoring on Breach alerts you if that changes.
Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.
Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.
Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.
Retrieved 2026-10-25
Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.
Reviews of this site
Share your experience with federalreservehistory.org. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.
Community rating
No published reviews yet. Be the first to review federalreservehistory.org.