Skip to main content

Security report for feadin.eu

Feadin.eu · Other · N/a

High risk. 9 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

48/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

Feadin.eu is a personal blog maintained by Paolo, an EU citizen and IT professional with interests in film and personal opinions. The site serves as a platform for sharing weekly film-related posts, lists, and links. It targets a general audience interested in cinema and personal reflections. The business model is non-commercial, focusing on content sharing rather than monetization or services. The website is built using the Hugo static site generator with the PaperMod theme, indicating a modern, lightweight technical infrastructure. The site is moderately optimized for mobile and SEO, with basic accessibility features. Security posture is minimal, lacking standard security headers and privacy policies, which presents compliance and trust challenges. No contact or business information is provided, limiting business credibility. Overall, the site is safe and suitable for general audiences but would benefit from enhanced security and privacy compliance measures.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching feadin.eu

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
100
Security headers
15
Email security
70
DNS health
60
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
48

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The website operates as a niche personal blog with no evident commercial activities or partnerships. It leverages open-source static site technology for content delivery, minimizing hosting complexity. The absence of contact details and business policies suggests a low emphasis on formal business operations or customer engagement. External links to social media and film-related platforms support content discovery and community interaction. The site’s growth potential is limited by its personal nature and lack of monetization strategies. There are no indications of partnerships, subsidiaries, or parent company relationships. The blog’s competitive advantage lies in its curated film content and personal voice, appealing to a specific audience segment.

Security posture

The security maturity of the website is low. The site uses HTTPS (implied by canonical URLs) but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security. No privacy or cookie policies are present, which may lead to GDPR non-compliance risks. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are provided. The site includes a minimal tracking script from tinylytics.app, but no explicit consent mechanism is detected. The absence of contact information and security policies reduces transparency and trustworthiness. While no critical vulnerabilities are apparent from the content, the site would benefit from implementing basic security best practices and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy and cookie policy to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options, X-Content-Type-Options) to enhance security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information or a contact form to improve business credibility and user trust.
  4. Establish an incident response policy and vulnerability disclosure process, including a security.txt file.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and tracking tools to ensure privacy compliance and minimize user tracking.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Feadin.eu
Description
Feadin.eu gathers imperfect ideas, sketchy opinions and interesting links collected by Paolo: EU citizen, IT professional, film buff.
Key services
blog posts, lists, links, personal opinions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
Hugo, PaperMod theme, JavaScript
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100

Analytics and tracking

Services
tinylytics.app
Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
tinylytics.app
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a personal blog with regular posts about films and personal opinions.
  2. No contact emails or phone numbers found on the site.
  3. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies detected.
  4. No security policies or incident response information available.
  5. Uses Hugo static site generator with PaperMod theme.
  6. Includes minimal external tracking via tinylytics.app.
  7. No forms or data collection fields detected.
  8. No WHOIS data available due to EURid privacy restrictions.
  9. No signs of WAF or content blocking.
  10. Content is safe and suitable for general audiences.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Hugo static site generator with the PaperMod theme, indicating a modern and efficient static site architecture. The site uses minimal JavaScript, primarily for UI enhancements such as theme toggling and smooth scrolling. External resources include a tracking script from tinylytics.app and social media links. The site is responsive and mobile-friendly with basic accessibility considerations. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data describing the organization. No CMS or dynamic backend is detected, reducing attack surface but limiting interactive features. Performance is moderate, with lazy loading of images and preloading of CSS. Hosting provider details are not disclosed. Overall, the technical implementation is solid for a personal blog but could be improved with enhanced security headers and privacy features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with feadin.eu. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review feadin.eu.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.