Skip to main content

Security report for fdss-improveni.co.uk

Non Videri B.V. · Other · Curaçao

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

63/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

SpinTime Casino is an online gambling platform targeting UK players, offering a wide range of casino games, live dealer experiences, and sports betting. The business operates under a Curaçao license and provides mobile apps alongside a responsive website. The platform emphasizes user-friendly navigation, a variety of payment methods, and ongoing promotions to attract and retain players. Technically, the site uses modern web standards with good mobile optimization and fast performance. Security posture is adequate with HTTPS and secure forms, but lacks visible security headers and explicit incident response contacts. Privacy policies are present and GDPR compliance is indicated, though cookie consent mechanisms are missing. Overall, the site is functional and professional but could improve transparency and security practices. The domain WHOIS data shows some inconsistency in creation date, which slightly impacts trust but does not negate legitimacy.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
68/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

  4. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fdss-improveni.co.uk

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
37
Security headers
55
Email security
60
DNS health
60
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
68
Average
63

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

SpinTime Casino positions itself as a combined casino and sportsbook platform for UK customers, leveraging popular game providers and a Curaçao license to operate offshore. The business model relies on attracting players with generous bonuses and a broad game selection. The company, Non Videri B.V., is registered in Curaçao, consistent with the licensing claims. The platform supports multiple deposit and withdrawal methods including cryptocurrencies and e-wallets, catering to diverse user preferences. Marketing includes affiliate programs and email promotions. The site is designed for ease of use with familiar layouts and clear navigation, targeting adult gamblers seeking non-UKGC licensed options. Growth potential exists in the UK market segment seeking non-GamStop casinos.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses secure form inputs, indicating a baseline security posture. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy, HSTS, and X-Frame-Options reduces defense-in-depth. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, which limits transparency and preparedness for security events. The presence of an AML policy shows regulatory awareness. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Overall, security is adequate but could be significantly improved by adopting best practices and publishing clear security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and configure HTTP security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to enhance protection against common web attacks.
  2. Add a cookie consent banner/mechanism to comply fully with GDPR and ePrivacy regulations.
  3. Publish explicit incident response and vulnerability disclosure contact information to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Regularly audit and update third-party scripts and dependencies to avoid vulnerabilities.
  5. Enhance business transparency by providing more detailed ownership and licensing information on the website.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
Non Videri B.V.
Registration number
165762
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
Non Videri B.V.
Description
SpinTime Casino is a reliable online gaming platform for UK players offering slots, live casino games, sports betting, and bonuses. It operates under a Curaçao (CGA) licence and provides mobile apps and a mobile-friendly website.
Key services
Online slots, Live casino games, Sports betting, Mobile apps (iOS and Android), Bonuses and promotions
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
HTML5, CSS3, JavaScript, woff2 fonts, Fetch API
Platforms
Desktop, Mobile (iOS and Android apps), Mobile web responsive
Performance
fast
Mobile
excellent
Accessibility
good
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Secure form inputs with validation
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML
  • Use of SSL encryption
  • Anti-Money Laundering policy in place

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a fully functional online casino and sportsbook platform targeting UK players.
  2. Content is comprehensive with detailed sections on games, bonuses, payments, and support.
  3. No signs of WAF or content blocking detected.
  4. No phone numbers found; contact primarily via email and contact form.
  5. No social media links explicitly found in the HTML content.
  6. Security headers not explicitly visible in provided data; recommend adding.
  7. Privacy and cookie policies present but no explicit cookie consent mechanism detected.
  8. Business transparency moderate; ownership details limited but typical for offshore operators.
  9. Website uses modern web technologies and is mobile optimized.
  10. No explicit incident response or vulnerability disclosure information found.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses modern HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript with optimized font loading and responsive design, ensuring good performance and mobile compatibility. The site loads quickly and uses structured data (JSON-LD) for SEO enhancement. No CMS or hosting provider was detected from the HTML content. The use of multiple game provider demo domains indicates integration with third-party gaming platforms. The site lacks visible security headers and cookie consent mechanisms, which are technical gaps. Overall, the technical infrastructure is solid but could benefit from improved security configurations and privacy compliance features.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fdss-improveni.co.uk. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fdss-improveni.co.uk.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.