Skip to main content

Security report for fctulsa.com

FC Tulsa · Other · United States

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in Security headers, GDPR outside view and 2 other checks.

Security score

66/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FC Tulsa is a professional soccer club based in Oklahoma, competing in the USL Championship, the second division of U.S. Soccer. Founded in 2015 as Tulsa Roughnecks FC and rebranded in 2020, the club targets soccer fans and the local community with professional matches and fan engagement. The website is built on WordPress with modern technologies including React and integrates marketing and analytics tools such as HubSpot and Google Analytics. Privacy and cookie consent mechanisms are well implemented, reflecting good compliance practices. However, the absence of WHOIS data and explicit contact information slightly reduces trustworthiness. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS enforced, but could be improved by adding security headers and visible incident response policies. Overall, the site is professional, well-branded, and serves its audience effectively.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
73/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

  2. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

  3. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1
    • High

      Weak SSL Key Length

      SSL certificate uses 256-bit key, which is considered weak

      What to do: Use at least 2048-bit RSA or 256-bit ECC key

      • CWE-326
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • Mozilla TLS: Mozilla Server Side TLS 6.0 intermediate: rsa_key_size 2048

  4. DNS health

    DNS sends visitors and email to the right servers. Misconfigured records can cause outages or let someone redirect your traffic.

    • High

      Weak SPF Policy

      SPF record has permissive policy allowing any server to send email

      What to do: Use -all or ~all qualifier for better email security

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fctulsa.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
42
Security headers
45
Email security
70
DNS health
65
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
73
Average
66

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club operates in the professional sports sector with a focus on soccer in the USL Championship league. It maintains partnerships with league organizations and uses a digital platform to engage fans and promote events. The business model revolves around sports entertainment, merchandising, and community involvement. The website's integration with multiple social media platforms and marketing tools indicates a mature digital marketing strategy. Growth potential is supported by league affiliations and expansion teams. The lack of detailed business registration data online suggests a need for improved transparency.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses a cookie consent banner, indicating awareness of privacy and security best practices. However, no explicit security headers were detected, and no incident response or security policy pages were found. The use of multiple third-party scripts increases the attack surface and requires regular security audits. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were observed in the HTML content. The security score is good but can be enhanced by implementing additional headers and publishing security policies.

Recommendations

  1. Add and enforce security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Content-Type-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  2. Publish a clear security policy and incident response contact information on the website.
  3. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to improve trust and legitimacy.
  4. Include explicit company contact information such as emails and phone numbers for transparency.
  5. Regularly audit third-party scripts and marketing tools for security vulnerabilities.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FC Tulsa
Description
FC Tulsa is Oklahoma’s premier professional soccer club that plays in the USL Championship, the second division of U.S. Soccer. FC Tulsa was founded in 2015 as Tulsa Roughnecks FC, but was relaunched under its current name prior to the 2020 season.
Key services
Professional soccer matches, Fan engagement, Merchandising, Community events
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
WordPress 6.6.2, React 18.3.1, FontAwesome 5.15.4, Yoast SEO plugin, HubSpot scripts, Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics (gtag.js), Osano Consent Management, SportsEngine platform
Frameworks
React
Platforms
WordPress
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent banner implemented
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, HubSpot Analytics, Parsely
Tracking level
extensive
Privacy practices
good

Advertising

Ad networks
Google DoubleClick, HubSpot Ads
Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Twitter Universal Website Tag, Reddit Pixel
Marketing tools
HubSpot, WisePops, ShareThis
Transparency
good

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is a professional sports club site for FC Tulsa soccer team.
  2. Content is rich with team info, league affiliations, and social media links.
  3. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and warrants further investigation.
  4. Good privacy and cookie consent mechanisms implemented.
  5. Multiple third-party marketing and analytics scripts present.
  6. No visible security headers detected in provided data.
  7. No contact emails or phone numbers explicitly found in HTML content.
  8. No terms of service page detected.
  9. Site uses WordPress CMS with modern technologies like React and HubSpot integration.
Technical notes

Notes

The website uses WordPress CMS with React for frontend components, supported by FontAwesome icons and Google Fonts. It integrates HubSpot for marketing automation and Google Tag Manager for analytics. The site loads multiple external scripts for ads, tracking, and social sharing. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility features. SEO is enhanced by Yoast SEO plugin and structured data in JSON-LD format. Hosting provider details are not explicitly found. The technical stack is modern but requires ongoing maintenance to manage third-party dependencies and security.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fctulsa.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fctulsa.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.