Skip to main content

Security report for fcslovanliberec.cz

FC Slovan Liberec · Other · Czech Republic

High risk. 8 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

47/100

Risk levelHigh

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FC Slovan Liberec operates an official website serving as the primary digital platform for the Czech football club. The site offers comprehensive content including team news, match schedules, ticketing options, fan merchandise, and multimedia galleries, targeting football fans and local community members. The website demonstrates a consistent brand presence and integrates multiple partner and sponsor domains, reflecting a well-established sports organization. Technically, the site employs modern web technologies such as Bootstrap and jQuery, with performance and mobile optimization rated as good. Security posture is solid with HTTPS enforced and cookie consent mechanisms implemented, though explicit security headers and detailed privacy policies are absent. The lack of WHOIS data is a notable gap, reducing domain trustworthiness despite the legitimate appearance of the site. Overall, the website is professional and user-friendly but would benefit from enhanced transparency in privacy and security policies.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
40/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

8 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcslovanliberec.cz

This scan found 26 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
20
Email security
60
DNS health
80
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
40
Average
47

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The club maintains a strong market position within Czech football, leveraging partnerships with major sponsors like Tipsport and Chance. Revenue streams likely include ticket sales, merchandise via the fan shop, and media content subscriptions. The target audience encompasses local and regional football fans, with digital engagement through social media and multimedia content. The website's integration with ticketing and fan shop platforms indicates a diversified business model focused on fan experience and monetization. The presence of multiple partner domains suggests a broad partnership ecosystem supporting club operations. Growth indicators include active content updates and social media activity. Strategic observations highlight the need for improved privacy and security transparency to align with best practices and regulatory compliance.

Security posture

The website exhibits a moderate to strong security maturity level with enforced HTTPS and a cookie consent framework that supports user choice. However, the absence of explicit security headers such as Content Security Policy (CSP), HTTP Strict Transport Security (HSTS), and X-Frame-Options limits protection against certain web-based attacks. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. Compliance gaps include missing privacy policy documentation and lack of published incident response or security contact information. Data protection practices appear basic, with no evidence of a designated Data Protection Officer or vulnerability disclosure program. Incident response readiness cannot be assessed due to lack of published information. Overall, the security culture appears functional but could be enhanced by adopting industry-standard policies and transparency measures.

Recommendations

  1. Implement and publish a comprehensive privacy policy detailing data collection, processing, and user rights to improve GDPR compliance.
  2. Add standard security headers (CSP, HSTS, X-Frame-Options) to strengthen web security posture.
  3. Provide clear contact information for security incidents and designate a Data Protection Officer to enhance trust and compliance.
  4. Develop and publish a vulnerability disclosure policy or security.txt file to facilitate responsible reporting.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and conduct regular security audits to maintain and improve overall website security and user experience.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FC Slovan Liberec
Description
Official website of the football team FC Slovan Liberec providing news, match info, team rosters, ticketing, fan shop, and multimedia content.
Key services
Team news and updates, Match schedules and results, Ticket sales and ticketing app, Fan shop merchandise, Multimedia content including photos and videos
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.6.0, Bootstrap 5.1.3, Google Fonts (Titillium Web), Google Tag Manager, Google Analytics, OpTA Widgets, Cookie Consent scripts
Frameworks
Bootstrap
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
85/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Cookie consent with granular controls
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Google Tag Manager
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
basic

Advertising

Ad networks
Tipsport, Chance
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and multimedia.
  2. No WHOIS data available, which is unusual and reduces domain trust.
  3. Cookie consent mechanism is implemented with granular controls.
  4. No explicit privacy policy or terms of service pages found.
  5. Multiple external partner and sponsor domains linked.
  6. No direct contact emails or phone numbers found on main page.
  7. Social media presence is strong with official accounts linked.
  8. No security.txt or vulnerability disclosure information found.
  9. No explicit security policies or incident response info published.
  10. Website uses modern technologies and frameworks.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using a modern technology stack including Bootstrap 5 and jQuery 3.6, with integration of Google Fonts and Google Tag Manager for analytics and marketing. The site loads external scripts and stylesheets from reputable CDNs, contributing to moderate performance. Mobile optimization is good, with responsive design elements and accessible navigation. SEO is supported by proper meta tags and Open Graph metadata. However, the absence of a detected CMS suggests a custom or proprietary platform, which may require dedicated maintenance. Hosting provider details are not evident from the HTML content. Technical risks include potential lack of automated security updates and missing security headers. Opportunities exist to improve performance by optimizing script loading and enhancing accessibility compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcslovanliberec.cz. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcslovanliberec.cz.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.