Skip to main content

Security report for fcservicestation.com

FCServiceStation · Other · N/a

Medium risk. 9 critical or high findings in Email security, Security headers and 2 other checks.

Security score

58/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FCServiceStation operates as a subscription billing service primarily targeting adult content websites, providing a platform for secure subscription management and billing since 2015. The website positions itself as a trusted merchant facilitating transactions for various internet websites, with a focus on subscription cancellation and customer support via a 24/7 toll-free phone line. The business model centers on acting as a payment processor and account service station for multiple online services. Technically, the website is basic with minimal use of modern web technologies. It uses standard HTML and CSS with DNS hosted on Cloudflare, but lacks advanced frameworks, CMS, or analytics tools. The site is moderately performant but shows limited mobile optimization and accessibility features. No security headers or HTTPS status were detected from the provided data, indicating potential risks in secure communications. From a security perspective, the site has a weak posture due to the absence of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and lack of privacy or cookie policies. The domain registration is consistent and stable, with clientTransferProhibited status and a domain age appropriate for the business claims. However, the lack of email contact and detailed company information reduces transparency and trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are evident. Overall, the website presents moderate business credibility but requires significant improvements in security, privacy compliance, and technical modernization to enhance trustworthiness and user protection. Strategic recommendations include implementing HTTPS, adding comprehensive privacy and cookie policies, improving mobile and accessibility features, and establishing clear incident response channels.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
50/ 100 · Medium
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

9 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. Email security

    SPF, DKIM and DMARC stop others sending email that looks like it comes from your domain, a common route to phishing and invoice fraud.

    • Critical

      No email authentication configured

      Domain is vulnerable to email spoofing

      What to do: Implement SPF, DKIM, and DMARC immediately

  2. Security headers

    Security headers are instructions your web server sends to every visitor’s browser. Missing ones leave visitors more exposed to attacks such as clickjacking and injected scripts.

    • High

      Missing Strict-Transport-Security header

      Forces HTTPS connections

      What to do: Add "Strict-Transport-Security: max-age=31536000; includeSubDomains; preload"

      • CWE-319
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V3.4.1
    • High

      Missing X-Frame-Options header

      Prevents clickjacking attacks

      What to do: Add "X-Frame-Options: DENY" or "X-Frame-Options: SAMEORIGIN"

    • High

      Missing Content-Security-Policy header

      Controls resources the browser is allowed to load

      What to do: Implement a Content-Security-Policy appropriate for your application

      • ASVS V3.4.3
      • OWASP Secure Headers: OWASP Secure Headers Project recommends Content-Security-Policy: default-src 'self'; form-action 'self'; base-uri 'self'; object-src 'none';…

  3. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcservicestation.com

This scan found 25 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
75
Security headers
15
Email security
40
DNS health
70
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
50
Average
58

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

FCServiceStation holds a niche position as a subscription billing service provider for adult and other internet websites, leveraging a business model focused on payment processing and subscription management. Its competitive advantage lies in its long-standing presence since 2015 and 24/7 customer support via a toll-free number. Revenue streams likely derive from transaction fees or service charges to partner websites. The target customer segment includes end-users of subscription-based adult content and other online services. The company appears to operate independently without disclosed parent or subsidiary relationships. Growth indicators are limited due to minimal online presence and lack of marketing or analytics tools. The partnership ecosystem is not evident from the website content or linked domains.

Security posture

The current security maturity level of FCServiceStation is low to moderate. Key vulnerabilities include the absence of HTTPS confirmation, missing security headers, and lack of documented privacy and cookie policies, which are critical for GDPR compliance and user trust. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure information is provided, indicating limited preparedness for security incidents. Data protection practices are unclear due to missing policies and contact points for security concerns. The security culture appears minimal, with no visible certifications or frameworks adopted. These gaps expose the business to potential risks including data interception, regulatory non-compliance, and reputational damage.

Recommendations

  1. Implement HTTPS with a valid SSL/TLS certificate to secure all communications.
  2. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies to comply with GDPR and enhance user trust.
  3. Add security headers such as Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  4. Establish and publicize an incident response plan and vulnerability disclosure process with clear contact channels.
  5. Improve mobile optimization and accessibility to enhance user experience and broaden audience reach.
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FCServiceStation
Description
FCServiceStation is a trusted merchant since 2015 offering subscription billing services for various internet websites, primarily adult content related, providing a safe and secure environment for transactions.
Key services
Subscription billing services, Subscription management including cancellation
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
HTML, CSS, Cloudflare DNS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
basic
Accessibility
basic
SEO
basic

Security

Observed score
40/100
Good practices seen
  • Domain status clientTransferProhibited

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website content is accessible and not blocked by WAF.
  2. No privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. Contact information limited to a toll-free phone number only.
  4. No email addresses or physical addresses provided.
  5. No social media links or external trusted partner domains found.
  6. Minimal technical sophistication; no modern frameworks or CMS detected.
  7. No analytics or advertising scripts detected.
  8. Security posture is weak due to lack of HTTPS info and security headers.
  9. WHOIS data is consistent and domain age supports business claims.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built using basic HTML and CSS without detectable modern frameworks or CMS platforms. DNS is managed via Cloudflare, which provides some resilience and performance benefits. The site lacks analytics, advertising, or tracking scripts, indicating minimal data collection and user tracking. Performance is moderate but could benefit from optimization. The absence of HTTPS and security headers represents a significant technical risk. There is no evidence of technical debt but also no signs of modernization or scalability features. Opportunities exist to adopt modern web technologies, improve SEO, and enhance security configurations to support business growth and compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcservicestation.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcservicestation.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.