Skip to main content

Security report for fcilevadia.ee

FCI Levadia · Other · Estonia

Partial score · DNS & email only

34/100

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FCI Levadia is an Estonian football club with an online presence primarily focused on providing football-related content and engaging with local sports fans. The website is built on WordPress and utilizes common plugins such as Yoast SEO and WP Rocket to enhance SEO and performance. The technical infrastructure is moderate, hosted by Zone Media OÜ, a known Estonian registrar and hosting provider. The site is accessible without any WAF or security challenge blocking content. However, the website lacks critical privacy and cookie policies, contact information, and published security or incident response policies, which are important for compliance and trust. Security posture is basic with no advanced headers or vulnerability disclosures evident. Overall, the site is functional but would benefit from improvements in privacy compliance, security best practices, and business transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
25/ 100 · Critical
Checks completed
6of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

6 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • Critical

      EU business without adequate privacy measures

      EU businesses are subject to strict GDPR requirements

      What to do: Implement comprehensive GDPR compliance including privacy policy, cookie consent, and data protection measures

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, Google APIs

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • Critical

      Unable to retrieve SSL certificate

      Could not establish secure connection to retrieve certificate information

      What to do: Check if the server is accessible and SSL/TLS is properly configured

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fcilevadia.ee

This scan found 17 issues across 5 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
0
Email security
70
DNS health
55
Network security
20
GDPR outside view
25
Average
34

Not counted

  • Security headers: did not complete in this scan.
  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The football club operates in the sports sector, targeting local and regional football fans and sports enthusiasts. Its business model revolves around team management, fan engagement, and content distribution related to football matches and club news. The domain age and registration details align with the club's establishment timeline, indicating legitimacy. The website's SEO and performance tools suggest an intent to maintain a professional digital presence, although the lack of detailed business contact information and policies limits full credibility. There are no detected partnerships or subsidiaries linked via domain analysis.

Security posture

The website demonstrates a basic security posture with HTTPS enabled but lacks visible security headers such as Content-Security-Policy or Strict-Transport-Security. No incident response or vulnerability disclosure mechanisms are published, and no security frameworks are referenced. The absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates potential compliance gaps with GDPR and other data protection regulations. Forms and data collection methods are not clearly identified, limiting assessment of secure data handling. Overall, the security maturity is low to moderate, with recommendations to enhance policies, headers, and transparency.

Recommendations

  1. Publish comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with explicit GDPR compliance and consent mechanisms.
  2. Implement security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and Strict-Transport-Security.
  3. Add clear contact information including company emails and phone numbers for support and security incident reporting.
  4. Establish and publish an incident response and vulnerability disclosure policy, including security contact channels.
  5. Regularly audit and update SSL/TLS configurations to maintain excellent security standards.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FCI Levadia
Description
FCI Levadia is a football club based in Estonia, providing football-related services and content.
Key services
Football team management, Match schedules and results, Fan engagement and news
Content quality
basic
Branding
moderate

Technology

Stack
WordPress, Yoast SEO, WP Rocket, Swiper.js, jQuery
Platforms
Web
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
55/100

Analytics and tracking

Tracking level
minimal
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Transparency
poor

Site quality

Design
basic
User experience
basic
Content relevance
basic
Navigation
basic
Professionalism
basic
Trustworthiness
moderate

Key observations

  1. Website is a WordPress-based football club site with basic content and SEO optimization.
  2. No visible privacy, cookie, or terms of service policies found.
  3. No contact emails, phone numbers, or physical addresses explicitly found in the HTML content.
  4. No security or incident response policies published.
  5. No analytics or advertising scripts detected in the provided HTML snippet.
  6. WHOIS data indicates a legitimate domain registration with no privacy protection.
  7. Site uses WP Rocket for performance optimization and Yoast SEO for SEO.
  8. No WAF or blocking mechanisms detected.
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on WordPress CMS with Yoast SEO and WP Rocket plugins, indicating a standard modern CMS infrastructure. It uses common web fonts and Swiper.js for UI components. Hosting is provided by Zone Media OÜ, a reputable Estonian registrar and hosting provider. Performance optimizations are in place but could be further enhanced with additional caching and CDN strategies. Mobile optimization is good, but accessibility features are basic. SEO meta tags are present, but structured data like JSON-LD or Open Graph tags are minimal or absent. No advanced frameworks or custom technologies detected. Technical risks include lack of security headers and incomplete privacy compliance.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fcilevadia.ee. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fcilevadia.ee.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.