Skip to main content

Security report for fbsindustry.com

FBS Industry · Manufacturing · Latvia

Medium risk. 5 critical or high findings in GDPR outside view and SSL/TLS.

Security score

70/100

Risk levelMedium

0–100, higher is better. How it is calculated

FBS Industry is a modern high-tech manufacturing company based in Latvia specializing in metal constructions and parts. The company offers a wide range of metal products including steel buildings, metal wall panels, swimming pools, stairs, railings, park benches, industrial containers, lockers, and garden grills. With over 10 years of experience, 70 employees, and a 2000+ sqm production facility, FBS Industry positions itself as a full-service provider in the metal industry, delivering planning, production, coating, and construction services. The website reflects a professional and consistent brand image with clear contact information and ISO:9001 certification, supporting its market credibility. Technically, the website uses modern web technologies such as jQuery, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, and service workers, hosted on a multiscreensite CMS platform. However, the absence of privacy and cookie policies indicates compliance gaps, and the lack of WHOIS registration data raises concerns about domain transparency. Security posture is generally good with HTTPS and no exposed sensitive data, but security headers are missing. Overall, the site is well-designed and functional but would benefit from enhanced privacy compliance and domain registration transparency.

Scanned

NIS2 and GDPR posture

GDPR outside view
35/ 100 · High
Checks completed
7of 7

NIS2 Art. 21(2)

  1. (a) Risk analysis and security policies: Not visible from outside
  2. (b) Incident handling: One indicator
  3. (c) Business continuity, backups and crisis management: Not visible from outside
  4. (d) Supply chain security: Not visible from outside
  5. (e) Secure acquisition, development and maintenance, including vulnerability handling: Partly checked
  6. (f) Assessing the effectiveness of security measures: Not visible from outside
  7. (g) Cyber hygiene and security training: Not visible from outside
  8. (h) Cryptography and encryption: Partly checked
  9. (i) HR security, access control and asset management: One indicator
  10. (j) Multi-factor authentication and secured communications: Not visible from outside

This scan rated NIS2 with an earlier keyword method that is no longer shown; rescan for the per-article view. Risk management, continuity, supply chain, training, MFA, management oversight (Art. 20) and incident reporting (Art. 23) need internal evidence, and Guard cannot tell whether NIS2 applies to this organisation.

GDPR is indicative only, based on publicly visible signals: Articles 7, 12, 13 and 32 of Regulation (EU) 2016/679 and Article 5(3) of the ePrivacy Directive. Not a certification or legal assessment.

Priority findings

5 findings rated critical or high. Fix these first.

  1. GDPR outside view

    These are the privacy signals visitors and data protection authorities look for under GDPR.

    • High

      No Privacy Policy found

      GDPR requires a clear and accessible privacy policy

      What to do: Add a comprehensive privacy policy page and link to it prominently

    • High

      No Cookie Policy found

      GDPR requires clear information about cookie usage

      What to do: Add a dedicated cookie policy explaining cookie usage and purposes

    • High

      No Cookie Consent Banner found

      GDPR requires explicit consent for non-essential cookies

      What to do: Implement a cookie consent banner that appears on first visit

    • High

      Third-party services without privacy policy

      Detected services: Google Analytics, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn

      What to do: Document all third-party data sharing in your privacy policy

  2. SSL/TLS

    TLS encrypts the connection and proves the site is really yours. Weak or expiring certificates trigger browser warnings and put traffic at risk.

    • High

      Weak Protocols Supported

      Server supports weak protocols: TLSv1.1

      What to do: Disable TLS 1.0, TLS 1.1, and all SSL versions

      • CWE-327
      • OWASP A04:2025
      • ASVS V12.1.1

Need hands-on remediation? Email guard@offseq.com

Keep watching fbsindustry.com

This scan found 23 issues across 6 checks. Monitoring re-runs those checks daily, emails you when something material changes and records each fix, so you can show progress.

Daily monitoring

Recommended

€25per month

  • TLS certificates and expiry
  • DNS records
  • SPF, DKIM and DMARC
  • Security headers
  • GDPR and NIS2 posture
  • Exposed services
  • Third-party trackers
  • Security score drift

Email alerts on material changes and an exportable JSON history of every change.

Billed monthly to your card. Cancel anytime. The full timeline opens with your unlock code.

Full report

€39.90one-time

  • The complete analysis as a PDF you can cite
  • Email delivery with an unlock code
  • Lifetime access to this report

Prices incl. 21% VAT. Secure checkout by Mollie; sold by SEQ SIA, Latvia.

Results by check

Each check with its score, findings and the evidence it collected.

How this score is calculated

The security score runs 0–100, higher is better. It is the plain average of the security checks that completed in this scan, each counted equally. A check that could not run is left out: it counts neither as a pass nor as a fail.

Counted in this score

SSL/TLS
62
Security headers
70
Email security
75
DNS health
75
Network security
100
GDPR outside view
35
Average
70

Not counted

  • NIS2 outside view: Re-weights evidence from the TLS, email, DNS, network and hygiene checks, so counting it would count that evidence twice. Shown on its own.
  • OffSeq Observations: An AI reading of the site, useful context but not reproducible evidence. Shown on its own.

Findings that cap the score at 49

Each of these is serious on its own, so while any is present the site cannot rate better than high risk, however good the other checks are.

  • The certificate is not trusted by browsers
  • The website is not served over HTTPS
  • A database, remote desktop, file-sharing or Telnet service is reachable from the internet
  • The page loads a script from a compromised source
  • The domain registration has expired
  • SPF authorises every server to send mail as the domain

Partial scans

When the site blocks Guard or most checks cannot run, the score covers only the checks that ran (usually DNS and email), is capped at 75 and is shown as partial, without a risk level.

Risk levels

  • Critical0–25
  • High26–49
  • Medium50–75
  • Low76–100

Technical appendix

Business context, site observations and technical notes gathered during the scan, and the standards behind each reference.

Business context

Business profile

The company targets businesses and professionals in the construction and metal manufacturing sectors, offering both simple and complex contracts. Its business model is a full lifecycle service provider, including subcontracting for machining, tempering, forming, coating, and construction work. The company has secured EU funding for energy efficiency improvements, indicating growth and investment in sustainability. The website's social media presence is limited to Facebook, and no affiliate or partner domains were identified. The company demonstrates trust through certifications and clear contact channels but lacks publicly disclosed privacy and security policies.

Security posture

The website enforces HTTPS and uses service workers, which is positive for security and performance. However, it lacks important security headers such as Content-Security-Policy and X-Frame-Options, which could mitigate risks like clickjacking and cross-site scripting. No vulnerabilities or exposed sensitive data were detected in the HTML content. The absence of privacy and cookie policies suggests compliance gaps with GDPR and other regulations. Incident response and vulnerability disclosure information are not present, limiting transparency in security management. Overall, the security posture is moderate but can be improved by implementing recommended headers and compliance documentation.

Recommendations

  1. Implement comprehensive privacy and cookie policies with user consent mechanisms to ensure GDPR compliance.
  2. Add essential security headers including Content-Security-Policy, X-Frame-Options, and X-Content-Type-Options to enhance protection.
  3. Publish incident response and vulnerability disclosure policies to improve transparency and trust.
  4. Verify and update WHOIS domain registration information to ensure domain legitimacy and reduce suspicion.
  5. Enhance accessibility features and provide more detailed SEO metadata to improve user experience and search rankings.

Contact details published on the site

Addresses
Legal name
FBS Industry LTD
Site observations

Automated reading of the public site. Ratings are indicative.

Business

Company
FBS Industry
Description
Modern high-tech company operating as a professional partner in the metal industry offering simple and complex contracts. Wide selection of metal products including metal doors, steel constructions, metal wall panels, swimming pools, metal stairs, railings, park benches, industrial containers, lockers, and garden grills.
Key services
Structural steel buildings, Steel constructions, Metal wall panels, Swimming pools, Metal stairs and railings, Park benches, Industrial metal containers, Metal lockers, Garden grills, Powder coating
Content quality
good
Branding
consistent

Technology

Stack
jQuery 3.7.0, Google Tag Manager, Facebook Pixel, Ecwid e-commerce script, Service Worker, SVG icons
Platforms
Multiscreensite CMS
Performance
moderate
Mobile
good
Accessibility
basic
SEO
good

Security

Observed score
80/100
Good practices seen
  • HTTPS enforced
  • Service Worker registered
  • No exposed sensitive data in HTML

Analytics and tracking

Services
Google Analytics, Facebook Pixel
Tracking level
moderate
Privacy practices
poor

Advertising

Tracking pixels
Facebook Pixel, Google Analytics (gtag)
Marketing tools
SiteBehaviour
Transparency
basic

Site quality

Design
good
User experience
good
Content relevance
good
Navigation
good
Professionalism
good
Trustworthiness
high

Key observations

  1. Website is fully accessible with rich content and navigation
  2. No privacy or cookie policies found, indicating compliance gaps
  3. Contact information is clearly presented with multiple channels
  4. Use of modern web technologies and tracking scripts
  5. WHOIS data missing, which reduces trust in domain registration transparency
  6. No security headers detected, opportunity for security improvements
  7. ISO:9001 certification indicates quality management commitment
  8. EU funding project mentioned, supporting legitimacy
  9. Social media presence limited to Facebook
Technical notes

Notes

The website is built on the Multiscreensite CMS platform, utilizing modern JavaScript libraries such as jQuery 3.7.0 and tracking tools including Google Tag Manager and Facebook Pixel. It employs service workers for offline support and performance improvements. The site loads multiple fonts from Google Fonts and uses SVG icons for graphics. Performance is moderate with good mobile optimization and basic accessibility. SEO is supported by meta tags, Open Graph, and JSON-LD structured data describing the business and products. However, the site lacks some security headers and privacy compliance features, which are technical risks that should be addressed to improve overall security and regulatory adherence.
Standards and sources

Reference chips under each finding point to the standard, regulation or specification the finding relates to. They are taken from the official datasets below and mapped conservatively: a finding with no defensible link shows none. NIS2 and GDPR references mark where a finding is relevant evidence, not a compliance verdict. Implementing Regulation (EU) 2024/2690 binds digital infrastructure and digital service providers; for other entities it is the most detailed public reading of the Article 21 measures. WCAG, EN 301 549, European Accessibility Act and Web Accessibility Directive references name the requirement an automated accessibility rule relates to; they are not a conformance verdict.

Retrieved 2026-10-25

Reviews of this site

Share your experience with fbsindustry.com. Every review is verified by email and published after moderation.

Overall rating
Select a rating
4000 characters remaining

We’ll email you to confirm your review and keep your details private.

Community rating

No published reviews yet. Be the first to review fbsindustry.com.

Feedback on this report

Rate this report, add an optional comment, and tell us if you want a security specialist to follow up.

Overall report quality
Select a rating
2000 characters remaining

We only use your feedback to improve Guard reports. Contact details are never shared.